Skip to content

Fix imprecise definition of unsigned integers in Chapter 3.2 (Scalar Types) #4773

Description

@150410awe

URL: https://rust-book.cs.brown.edu/ch03-02-data-types.html#scalar-types

Issue: Imprecise definition of unsigned integers (Chapter 3.2)

Current wording ():
In the section introducing integer types, the book says:

"or whether it will only ever be positive and can therefore be represented without a sign (unsigned)."

Problem:
Mathematically, zero is neither positive nor negative. Unsigned integers can represent zero and positive numbers (i.e., non-negative numbers, >= 0), not just "positive" numbers. Using "positive" here is mathematically incorrect and may confuse learners.

Suggested fix:
Change the phrasing to:

"Or it's always non-negative (that is, zero or positive), so it doesn't need a sign (unsigned)"

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions