Skip to content

Cache Poisoning [2] in Nuxt OG Image

Moderate
harlan-zw published GHSA-2x6f-rp82-ppmj Jul 22, 2026

Package

npm nuxt-og-image (npm)

Affected versions

>= 6.2.5, < 6.7.0

Patched versions

6.7.0

Description

Vendor: Nuxt
Product: Nuxt OG Image
Version: 6.2.5
CWE-ID: CWE-349: Acceptance of Extraneous Untrusted Data With Trusted Data
CVSS vector v.4.0: 8.8 (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N)
Description: Due to the specifics of caching and key generation in the Open Graph image cache created by the module, an unauthenticated attacker can modify the content of the image (for example, the title parameter) that is delivered to the user.
Impact: Content Spoofing
Vulnerable component: route /_og/d/*.png
Exploitation conditions: Access to the application
Mitigation: Upgrade to 6.7.2 and set a sufficiently secure secret in config ogImage
Researcher: Dmitry Vanin (Positive Technologies)

Research

During the previous vulnerability research, it was discovered that version 6.2.5 changed the mechanism for generating cache indexes; it now takes into account the parameters passed during image generation.

However, the image is still generated from data transmitted to the attacker.

Listing 1. New code for generating indexes in cache

export function resolvePathCacheKey(e: H3Event, path: string, resolvedOptions?: Record<string, any>) {
  const siteConfig = getSiteConfig(e, {
    resolveRefs: true,
  })
  const basePath = withoutTrailingSlash(withoutLeadingSlash(normalizeKey(path)))
  const hashParts: any[] = [
    basePath,
    import.meta.prerender ? '' : siteConfig.url,
  ]
  // Hash resolved options (not raw query string) so unknown/extra query params
  // cannot produce unique cache keys and bypass the cache.
  if (resolvedOptions)
    hashParts.push(hash(resolvedOptions))
  return [
    (!basePath || basePath === '/') ? 'index' : basePath,
    hash(hashParts),
  ].join(':')
}

In this case, basePath is obtained from the _path parameter, resolvedOptions are the normalized settings of the component, for example:

Listing 2. An example of resolvedOptions

{"emojis":"noto","extension":"png","width":1200,"height":600,"cacheMaxAgeSeconds":259200,"component":"OgImageDefaultImageTakumi"}

From the analysis of resolvedOptions, it was concluded that, in general, all parameters are known either from the direct link to the OG Image or from the server response.

Vulnerability reproduction

  1. Find the route to OG Image.
    Figure 1. Demonstration of finding the route to OG Image
image
  1. Retrieve parameters from the server’s response, especially cacheMaxAgeSeconds (cache-control header, s-maxage key), the other parameters are known from the meta tags as well as from the c_<component name> parameter.
    Figure 2. Obtaining parameters
image
  1. Generate a cache key using a script.
    Listing 3. Srcipt
import {hash} from "ohash";

var url = "https://contoso.com"

var obj = JSON.parse(`{"emojis":"noto","extension":"png","width":1200,"height":600,"cacheMaxAgeSeconds":259200,"component":"OgImageBlogPostTakumi"}`)

var basePath = '/'

var hashParts = [
    basePath,
    url
  ]
  
if (obj)
	hashParts.push(hash(obj))

console.log([
    (!basePath || basePath === '/') ? 'index' : basePath,
    hash(hashParts),
  ].join(':'))
  1. Repeat the steps as in the vulnerability 1, but transmit the obtained cacheKey in addition.
  2. Thus, the same result as in the vulnerability 1 was obtained.
    Figure 4. Server response
image

Credits

Researcher: Dmitry Vanin (Positive Technologies)


Remediation (v6.7.0, #638): URL signing is enabled by default from v6.7.0; the signature covers the encoded params including cacheKey, so a forged or derived cache key on an unsigned request is rejected with 403 before it can select the cache slot.

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector Network
Attack Complexity Low
Attack Requirements None
Privileges Required None
User interaction None
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality None
Integrity Low
Availability None
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality None
Integrity None
Availability None

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector: This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible. This metric value (and consequently the resulting severity) will be larger the more remote (logically, and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerable system. The assumption is that the number of potential attackers for a vulnerability that could be exploited from across a network is larger than the number of potential attackers that could exploit a vulnerability requiring physical access to a device, and therefore warrants a greater severity.
Attack Complexity: This metric captures measurable actions that must be taken by the attacker to actively evade or circumvent existing built-in security-enhancing conditions in order to obtain a working exploit. These are conditions whose primary purpose is to increase security and/or increase exploit engineering complexity. A vulnerability exploitable without a target-specific variable has a lower complexity than a vulnerability that would require non-trivial customization. This metric is meant to capture security mechanisms utilized by the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: This metric captures the prerequisite deployment and execution conditions or variables of the vulnerable system that enable the attack. These differ from security-enhancing techniques/technologies (ref Attack Complexity) as the primary purpose of these conditions is not to explicitly mitigate attacks, but rather, emerge naturally as a consequence of the deployment and execution of the vulnerable system.
Privileges Required: This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess prior to successfully exploiting the vulnerability. The method by which the attacker obtains privileged credentials prior to the attack (e.g., free trial accounts), is outside the scope of this metric. Generally, self-service provisioned accounts do not constitute a privilege requirement if the attacker can grant themselves privileges as part of the attack.
User interaction: This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable system. This metric determines whether the vulnerability can be exploited solely at the will of the attacker, or whether a separate user (or user-initiated process) must participate in some manner.
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the VULNERABLE SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

CVE ID

No known CVE

Weaknesses

Acceptance of Extraneous Untrusted Data With Trusted Data

The product, when processing trusted data, accepts any untrusted data that is also included with the trusted data, treating the untrusted data as if it were trusted. Learn more on MITRE.