Skip to content

feat: Support footnotes that start on the next line. - #423

Merged
lepture merged 2 commits into
lepture:mainfrom
kylechui:main
Nov 29, 2025
Merged

feat: Support footnotes that start on the next line.#423
lepture merged 2 commits into
lepture:mainfrom
kylechui:main

Conversation

@kylechui

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

When footnotes get too long, prettier will format them to begin on the next line, with an indentation level of 4. This can be reproduced by formatting with prettier --prose-wrap=always. The current parser does not accurately parse this use case. Should resolve #373

@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Nov 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 91.56%. Comparing base (9f4ff6f) to head (0516c9e).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #423   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.56%   91.56%           
=======================================
  Files          34       34           
  Lines        2631     2633    +2     
  Branches      448      447    -1     
=======================================
+ Hits         2409     2411    +2     
  Misses        147      147           
  Partials       75       75           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 91.53% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@lepture
lepture merged commit 4adac1c into lepture:main Nov 29, 2025
24 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

multiline footnotes not parsed correctly

2 participants