Skip to content

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

153 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

Extended Version

This benchmark evaluates large language models (LLMs) using 940 NYT Connections puzzles, with additional words included to increase difficulty.

As of Feb 4, 2025, there is a new version of the benchmark. The standard NYT Connections benchmark is nearing saturation, with o1 scoring 90.7 and o3, along with other reasoning models, expected this year. The current rules require knowing only three categories, letting the fourth fall into place. To increase difficulty, Extended Connections adds up to four extra trick words to each puzzle. We double-check that none of the added words fit into any category used in the corresponding puzzle. New puzzles have expanded the total from 436 to 940 as of Feb 2, 2026.

Headline results use quadratic-v1 scoring: a puzzle with g exact groups contributes (g / 4)², so 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 groups earn 0%, 6.25%, 25%, 56.25%, and 100%, respectively. The leaderboard score is the mean of those per-puzzle values.

To reduce visual noise, scoreboard chart labels omit the implied word reasoning from positive parenthetical effort levels: for example, (high reasoning) is displayed as (high) and (xhigh reasoning) as (xhigh). The explicit negative mode remains (no reasoning). Model IDs and the canonical display names used in tables are unchanged.

Chart: Extended Version

Leaderboard

Scoreboard charts apply the current report-time suppression roster. The leaderboard tables retain every full-coverage result, including models omitted from charts, so historical results remain available for comparison.

Leaderboard: Extended Version

The main board includes only models that completed all 940 puzzles.

Rank Model Score % #Puzzles
1 Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 97.4 940
2 GPT-5.5 (xhigh reasoning) 96.2 940
3 GPT-5.5 (high reasoning) 95.2 940
4 Gemini 3 Pro Preview 94.4 940
5 Claude Opus 5 (xhigh reasoning) 94.3 940
6 GPT-5.6 Sol (xhigh reasoning) 93.8 940
7 Kimi K3 93.6 940
8 Claude Fable 5 (high reasoning) 92.7 940
9 Gemini 3.5 Flash 92.6 940
10 GPT-5.5 (medium reasoning) 92.4 940
11 Claude Opus 5 (high reasoning) 92.2 940
12 Claude Opus 4.6 (high reasoning) 92.1 940
13 GPT-5.4 (xhigh reasoning) 91.3 940
14 Claude Opus 4.8 (xhigh reasoning) 91.1 940
15 GPT-5.6 Sol (high reasoning) 91.0 940
16 GPT-5.4 (high reasoning) 90.6 940
17 Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent Exp Beta 0304 89.6 940
18 DeepSeek V4 Flash 89.6 940
19 Gemini 3.6 Flash 89.0 940
20 Claude Opus 4.8 (high reasoning) 88.3 940
21 Qwen 3.8 Max 88.3 940
22 GPT-5.4 (medium reasoning) 87.8 940
23 Grok 4.1 Fast Reasoning 87.4 940
24 Kimi K2.6 87.2 940
25 Grok 4.20 0309 (Reasoning) 85.4 940
26 Qwen 3.7 Max 85.1 940
27 Muse Spark 1.1 (high reasoning) 84.9 940
28 Grok 4.20 Reasoning Exp Beta 0304 83.7 940
29 GPT-5.2 (xhigh reasoning) 83.6 940
30 Gemini 3 Flash Preview 83.1 940
31 Claude Sonnet 4.6 (high reasoning) 80.9 940
32 Grok 4.5 (high reasoning) 79.9 940
33 GPT-5.2 Pro 79.3 940
34 GPT-5.6 Terra (high reasoning) 78.4 940
35 GLM-5.1 77.7 940
36 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Thinking 32K 76.4 940
37 Claude Opus 4.6 Thinking 16K 76.4 940
38 Claude Sonnet 5 (high reasoning) 75.1 940
39 GLM-5 74.8 940
40 Qwen 3.7 Plus 74.8 940
41 GLM-5.2 (high reasoning) 74.3 940
42 Qwen 3.6 Max Preview 74.1 940
43 Gemma 4 31B Reasoning 70.6 940
44 Kimi K2.5 Thinking 69.9 940
45 GPT-5.6 Luna (high reasoning) 69.4 940
46 GPT-5.2 (high reasoning) 68.1 940
47 DeepSeek V4 Pro 67.3 940
48 MiniMax-M3 65.1 940
49 GPT-5.4 Mini (xhigh reasoning) 61.8 940
50 GPT-5.2 (medium reasoning) 60.6 940
51 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (high reasoning) 60.4 940
52 Qwen 3.6 Plus 60.3 940
53 Qwen3.5-397B-A17B 58.9 940
54 Grok 4.3 55.2 940
55 GPT-5.2 (low reasoning) 54.2 940
56 Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking 16K 52.5 940
57 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 51.7 940
58 Claude Opus 4.5 (no reasoning) 49.4 940
59 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Thinking 16K 48.0 940
60 Qwen3.5-27B 47.9 940
61 Claude Sonnet 4.6 (no reasoning) 44.8 940
62 Qwen 3.7 Flash 43.8 940
63 Claude Opus 4.6 (no reasoning) 43.2 940
64 Qwen3.6-35B-A3B 41.6 940
65 Step 3.7 Flash (high reasoning) 39.7 940
66 Claude Opus 4.7 (high reasoning) 39.0 940
67 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking 16K 37.3 940
68 DeepSeek V3.2 36.7 940
69 Claude Sonnet 4.5 (no reasoning) 35.8 940
70 Xiaomi MiMo V2.5 Pro 34.4 940
71 Qwen3 Max (2026-01-23) 30.1 940
72 Step 3.5 Flash 28.4 940
73 ByteDance Seed2.0 Pro 28.4 940
74 Xiaomi MiMo V2 Pro 25.8 940
75 MiniMax-M2.7 24.7 940
76 Baidu Ernie 5.1 23.4 940
77 GPT-5.5 (no reasoning) 22.0 940
78 GPT-5.4 (no reasoning) 17.8 940
79 LongCat Flash Thinking 17.7 940
80 Tencent Hy3 Preview 17.2 940
81 MiniMax-M2.5 16.8 940
82 Arcee Trinity Large Thinking 16.5 940
83 Gemma 4 31B IT 15.7 940
84 Nemotron 3 Super 15.4 940
85 MiniMax-M2 14.8 940
86 GPT-5.2 (no reasoning) 14.5 940
87 Claude 4.5 Haiku 14.3 940
88 Mistral Medium 3.5 (high) 12.9 940
89 Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning 12.3 940
90 Qwen 3 Max Thinking 11.8 940
91 MiniMax-M2.1 11.2 940
92 Claude Opus 4.7 (no reasoning) 10.8 940
93 Baidu Ernie 5.0 10.3 940
94 Grok 4.20 0309 (Non-Reasoning) 8.6 940
95 DeepSeek V3.2 (no reasoning) 8.2 940
96 Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite Preview 8.2 940
97 Llama 4 Maverick 8.0 940
98 Grok 4.20 Non-Reasoning Exp Beta 0304 7.6 940
99 Mistral Large 3 7.5 940
100 Mistral Medium 3.1 6.5 940
101 Ling 2.6 1T 4.1 940

Model comparison scatter charts

Model family progress

This chart shows score progress over time within each model family on a shared 601-puzzle comparison set. Qwen 3.8 Max is the only highlighted model. Scatter charts apply both the current report-time suppression roster and the narrower scatter-specific suppression roster; suppression does not remove stored results or leaderboard rows.

Model family progress

Introduction date vs. score

This chart compares benchmark score against model introduction date on the same shared 601-puzzle comparison set, with Qwen 3.8 Max highlighted.

Introduction date vs. score

Cost vs. performance

This chart compares estimated average cost per puzzle with benchmark score for current full-coverage models. Orange arrows show direct model progressions when both endpoints are plotted. Qwen 3.8 Max is the sole highlight target, using Qwen's verified pay-as-you-go list pricing. The orange arrow from Qwen 3.7 Max to Qwen 3.8 Max shows the direct Max-model progression.

Cost vs. performance


Correlation of puzzle-level results: heatmap

Correlations


Newest 100 puzzles.

To counteract the possibility of an LLM's training data including the solutions, we have also tested only the 100 latest puzzles. Note that lower scores do not necessarily indicate that NYT Connections solutions are in the training data, as the difficulty of the first puzzles was lower.


Chart: Newest 100 puzzles, extended version

Newest 100 puzzles

This scoreboard chart applies the same report-time suppression roster as the full benchmark chart.

Leaderboard: Newest 100 puzzles, extended version

This view applies the same scoring rule to the newest 100 puzzles for every full-coverage model.

Rank Model Score % #Puzzles
1 Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 96.1 100
2 GPT-5.5 (xhigh reasoning) 96.1 100
3 GPT-5.5 (high reasoning) 95.2 100
4 Claude Opus 5 (xhigh reasoning) 94.5 100
5 GPT-5.6 Sol (xhigh reasoning) 94.4 100
6 Claude Fable 5 (high reasoning) 93.6 100
7 GPT-5.4 (xhigh reasoning) 93.4 100
8 GPT-5.6 Sol (high reasoning) 92.7 100
9 Gemini 3 Pro Preview 92.3 100
10 Claude Opus 4.8 (high reasoning) 92.1 100
11 Kimi K3 92.1 100
12 Claude Opus 5 (high reasoning) 91.9 100
13 Gemini 3.5 Flash 90.8 100
14 Claude Opus 4.8 (xhigh reasoning) 90.6 100
15 Qwen 3.8 Max 88.9 100
16 Gemini 3.6 Flash 88.5 100
17 GPT-5.4 (high reasoning) 88.4 100
18 Claude Opus 4.6 (high reasoning) 88.1 100
19 GPT-5.5 (medium reasoning) 87.3 100
20 DeepSeek V4 Flash 87.2 100
21 Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent Exp Beta 0304 85.2 100
22 Muse Spark 1.1 (high reasoning) 84.8 100
23 GPT-5.4 (medium reasoning) 84.4 100
24 Kimi K2.6 80.2 100
25 Qwen 3.7 Max 78.9 100
26 GPT-5.2 (xhigh reasoning) 78.6 100
27 Claude Opus 4.6 Thinking 16K 78.4 100
28 GLM-5.1 77.6 100
29 Grok 4.20 0309 (Reasoning) 77.4 100
30 Grok 4.5 (high reasoning) 77.2 100
31 Grok 4.20 Reasoning Exp Beta 0304 77.1 100
32 Grok 4.1 Fast Reasoning 75.2 100
33 Claude Sonnet 4.6 (high reasoning) 74.1 100
34 GLM-5.2 (high reasoning) 72.8 100
35 GPT-5.6 Terra (high reasoning) 72.4 100
36 GPT-5.2 Pro 71.8 100
37 Qwen 3.7 Plus 70.9 100
38 Claude Sonnet 5 (high reasoning) 69.9 100
39 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Thinking 32K 69.4 100
40 Qwen 3.6 Max Preview 69.4 100
41 GLM-5 67.5 100
42 GPT-5.2 (high reasoning) 66.2 100
43 GPT-5.6 Luna (high reasoning) 66.1 100
44 Gemma 4 31B Reasoning 65.9 100
45 Kimi K2.5 Thinking 63.7 100
46 MiniMax-M3 63.4 100
47 GPT-5.4 Mini (xhigh reasoning) 62.5 100
48 Gemini 3 Flash Preview 61.8 100
49 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (high reasoning) 60.7 100
50 DeepSeek V4 Pro 59.9 100
51 Qwen 3.6 Plus 57.1 100
52 GPT-5.2 (medium reasoning) 55.8 100
53 Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking 16K 51.6 100
54 Qwen3.5-397B-A17B 47.1 100
55 GPT-5.2 (low reasoning) 46.4 100
56 Grok 4.3 45.6 100
57 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 45.4 100
58 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Thinking 16K 45.3 100
59 Qwen3.5-27B 44.6 100
60 Claude Sonnet 4.5 (no reasoning) 43.6 100
61 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking 16K 43.0 100
62 Claude Opus 4.5 (no reasoning) 42.0 100
63 Claude Sonnet 4.6 (no reasoning) 40.4 100
64 Claude Opus 4.7 (high reasoning) 39.3 100
65 Claude 4.5 Haiku 37.5 100
66 Claude Opus 4.6 (no reasoning) 37.2 100
67 Qwen3.6-35B-A3B 35.5 100
68 Qwen 3.7 Flash 35.4 100
69 Step 3.7 Flash (high reasoning) 34.2 100
70 Qwen3 Max (2026-01-23) 31.6 100
71 Xiaomi MiMo V2.5 Pro 31.4 100
72 DeepSeek V3.2 29.7 100
73 MiniMax-M2.7 28.6 100
74 ByteDance Seed2.0 Pro 28.0 100
75 Step 3.5 Flash 22.8 100
76 Xiaomi MiMo V2 Pro 22.0 100
77 Baidu Ernie 5.1 20.0 100
78 GPT-5.4 (no reasoning) 19.8 100
79 GPT-5.5 (no reasoning) 19.1 100
80 Tencent Hy3 Preview 18.9 100
81 LongCat Flash Thinking 17.3 100
82 Arcee Trinity Large Thinking 16.9 100
83 MiniMax-M2.5 16.2 100
84 GPT-5.2 (no reasoning) 15.8 100
85 Gemma 4 31B IT 15.7 100
86 Mistral Medium 3.5 (high) 14.6 100
87 MiniMax-M2.1 12.8 100
88 Nemotron 3 Super 12.4 100
89 Claude Opus 4.7 (no reasoning) 11.9 100
90 MiniMax-M2 11.9 100
91 Qwen 3 Max Thinking 11.6 100
92 Baidu Ernie 5.0 10.7 100
93 Grok 4.20 0309 (Non-Reasoning) 9.4 100
94 Mistral Large 3 8.9 100
95 Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite Preview 8.9 100
96 Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning 8.8 100
97 Llama 4 Maverick 8.1 100
98 Grok 4.20 Non-Reasoning Exp Beta 0304 7.7 100
99 Mistral Medium 3.1 7.1 100
100 DeepSeek V3.2 (no reasoning) 6.8 100
101 Ling 2.6 1T 5.5 100

Humans vs. LLMs

To explore how top language models (LLMs) compare to humans in the New York Times Connections puzzle, we used official NYT performance data from December 2024 to February 2025, as analyzed by u/Bryschien1996, alongside a simulated gameplay setup that mirrors the human experience. This setup involves a multi-step process where solvers iteratively propose groups, receive feedback ("correct," "one away," "incorrect"), and are allowed up to four mistakes before failing. According to NYT data, the average human player solved approximately 71% of puzzles over the three-month period from December 2024 to February 2025, with solve rates ranging from 39% on the toughest days (e.g., February 2, 2025) to 98% on the easiest (e.g., February 26, 2025). It's worth noting that NYT Connections players are self-selected and likely perform better than the general population. We collected data from nine LLMs spanning a range of scores in the Extended Connections benchmark.

nyt_connections_chart_basic

The results reveal that top reasoning LLMs from OpenAI consistently outperform the average human player. DeepSeek R1 performs closest to the level of an average NYT Connections player.

Elite human players, however, set a higher standard, achieving a 100% win rate during the same period:

ex

o1, with a 98.9% win rate, comes close to this elite level. o1-pro, which has not yet been tested in this gameplay simulation setup, might be able to match these top humans. Thus, directly determining whether AI achieves superhuman performance on NYT Connections could hinge on comparing the number of mistakes made before fully solving each puzzle.


Original NYT Connections LLM Benchmark

This benchmark evaluates large language models (LLMs) using 436 NYT Connections puzzles. Three different prompts, not optimized for LLMs through prompt engineering, are used. Both uppercase and lowercase puzzles are assessed. Easier - no extra words added.

Chart: Original Version

nyt_connections_chart

Leaderboard: Original Version

Model Score
o1 90.7
o1-preview 87.1
o3-mini 72.4
DeepSeek R1 54.4
o1-mini 42.2
Multi-turn ensemble 37.8
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Exp 01-21 37.0
GPT-4 Turbo 28.3
GPT-4o 2024-11-20 27.9
GPT-4o 2024-08-06 26.5
Llama 3.1 405B 26.3
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (2024-10-22) 25.9
Claude 3 Opus 24.8
Grok Beta 23.7
Llama 3.3 70B 23.7
Gemini 1.5 Pro (Sept) 22.7
Deepseek-V3 21.0
Gemini 2.0 Flash Exp 20.0
Gemma 2 27B 18.8
Qwen 2.5 Max 18.6
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Exp 18.6
Mistral Large 2 17.4
Qwen 2.5 72B 14.8
Claude 3.5 Haiku 13.7
MiniMax-Text-01 13.6
Nova Pro 12.5
Phi-4 11.6
Mistral Small 3 10.5
DeepSeek-V2.5 9.9

Leaderboard: Older models

These legacy or incomplete runs use the same scoring rule but are excluded from the main board because they ran fewer than 940 total puzzles.

Rank Model Score % #Puzzles (window) Total Coverage
1 ByteDance Seed2.1 Pro 97.8 101 101/940
2 GLM-5.2 (max reasoning) 89.5 194 194/940
3 Sherlock Think Alpha 89.0 759 759/940
4 Inkling (high reasoning) 88.7 130 130/940
5 Grok 4 Fast Reasoning 88.0 759 759/940
6 Grok 4 87.8 759 759/940
7 Sonoma Sky Alpha 86.5 759 759/940
8 o3-pro (medium reasoning) 81.7 759 759/940
9 GPT-5 Pro 77.0 759 759/940
10 GLM-5.2 (max reasoning) 75.9 211 211/940
11 o1-pro (medium reasoning) 74.6 651 651/940
12 o3 (high reasoning) 70.5 759 759/940
13 GPT-5 (high reasoning) 67.8 759 759/940
14 o4-mini (high reasoning) 64.0 759 759/940
15 o3 (medium reasoning) 63.0 759 759/940
16 GPT-5 (medium reasoning) 61.8 759 759/940
17 o1 (medium reasoning) 60.1 651 651/940
18 GPT-5.1 (high reasoning) 59.7 759 759/940
19 o4-mini (medium reasoning) 58.4 651 651/940
20 GPT-5 mini (medium reasoning) 54.9 759 759/940
21 GPT-5 (low reasoning) 53.2 759 759/940
22 GPT-5.1 (medium reasoning) 51.2 759 759/940
23 o3-mini (high reasoning) 49.0 651 651/940
24 GLM-4.7 47.2 767 767/940
25 Claude Opus 4.1 Thinking 16K 45.3 759 759/940
26 Gemini 2.5 Pro 44.9 759 759/940
27 Kimi K2 Thinking 64K 44.6 924 924/940
28 DeepSeek V4 Flash (thinking) 43.9 759 759/940
29 o3-mini (medium reasoning) 40.1 651 651/940
30 Gemini 2.5 Pro Exp 03-25 40.1 651 651/940
31 Qwen 3 235B A22B 39.8 759 759/940
32 Claude Opus 4 Thinking 16K 35.2 759 759/940
33 DeepSeek R1 05/28 33.6 759 759/940
34 Qwen 3 235B A22B 25-07 Think 31.6 759 759/940
35 Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06 28.1 651 651/940
36 Claude Sonnet 4 Thinking 16K 26.4 759 759/940
37 Claude Sonnet 4 Thinking 64K 26.0 651 651/940
38 DeepSeek R1 24.4 651 651/940
39 GPT-OSS-120B 24.1 759 759/940
40 Claude Opus 4.1 (no reasoning) 21.7 759 759/940
41 Qwen 3 30B A3B 21.2 759 759/940
42 Qwen 3 32B 21.0 759 759/940
43 Qwen 3 30B A3B 25-07 Thinking 20.9 759 759/940
44 Claude 3.7 Sonnet Thinking 16K 19.7 651 651/940
45 Claude Opus 4 (no reasoning) 19.7 759 759/940
46 GPT-4.5 Preview 19.2 651 651/940
47 Qwen 3 Next 80B A3B Thinking 18.5 759 759/940
48 Qwen QwQ-32B 16K 17.8 651 651/940
49 Grok 3 Mini Beta (high) 17.2 759 759/940
50 GLM-4.5 17.0 759 759/940
51 o1-mini 14.1 651 651/940
52 Grok 3 Mini Beta (low) 14.0 651 651/940
53 GPT-5 (minimal reasoning) 13.9 759 759/940
54 Claude Sonnet 4 (no reasoning) 13.7 759 759/940
55 Claude Opus 4.6 Thinking 32K 13.6 98 98/940
56 Cohere Command A Reasoning 13.3 759 759/940
57 Gemini 2.5 Flash 12.8 759 759/940
58 Grok 4 Fast Non-Reasoning 12.5 759 759/940
59 GLM-4.6 12.5 759 759/940
60 Sherlock Dash Alpha 12.2 759 759/940
61 Quasar Alpha 12.1 651 651/940
62 Gemini 2.0 Flash Think Exp 01-21 12.0 649 649/940
63 Cohere Command A+ 12.0 898 898/940
64 GPT-4o Mar 2025 11.8 759 759/940
65 Qwen 3 Max Preview 11.6 759 759/940
66 Gemini 2.0 Pro Exp 02-05 11.2 651 651/940
67 Kimi K2-0905 11.0 759 759/940
68 GPT-4.1 10.8 759 759/940
69 Sonoma Dusk Alpha 10.6 759 759/940
70 MiniMax-M1 10.5 688 688/940
71 GPT-4o Feb 2025 10.3 651 651/940
72 Polaris Alpha 10.2 759 759/940
73 DeepSeek V3.1 Non-Think 10.1 759 759/940
74 GPT-5.1 (no reasoning) 10.0 759 759/940
75 Grok 3 Beta (no reasoning) 9.0 759 759/940
76 Kimi K2 8.9 759 759/940
77 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 8.7 651 651/940
78 Gemini 1.5 Pro (Sept) 8.7 601 601/940
79 Qwen 3 235B A22B 25-07 Instruct 8.6 759 759/940
80 GPT-4o 2024-11-20 8.6 601 601/940
81 Grok 2 12-12 8.5 651 651/940
82 Gemini 2.0 Flash 8.3 651 651/940
83 Claude 3 Opus 8.2 650 650/940
84 Claude 3.5 Sonnet 2024-10-22 8.1 651 651/940
85 GPT-4o 2024-08-06 7.6 601 601/940
86 Llama 4 Scout 7.6 759 759/940
87 Qwen 2.5 Max 7.6 651 651/940
88 DeepSeek V3-0324 7.4 759 759/940
89 Llama 3.1 405B 6.7 651 651/940
90 Baidu Ernie 4.5 300B A47B 6.5 759 759/940
91 DeepSeek V4 Flash 6.2 651 651/940
92 GPT-4.1 mini 6.1 759 759/940
93 Llama 3.3 70B 5.9 651 651/940
94 MiniMax-Text-01 5.9 759 759/940
95 Mistral Medium 3.1 5.5 759 759/940
96 LongCat Flash 5.2 660 660/940
97 Cohere Command A 5.0 759 759/940
98 Mistral Large 2 4.8 759 759/940
99 Mistral Small 3.2 4.3 759 759/940
100 Gemma 2 27B 4.3 651 651/940
101 Mistral Small 3.1 4.2 651 651/940
102 Gemma 3 27B 4.2 759 759/940
103 Amazon Nova Pro 4.1 759 759/940
104 Qwen 2.5 72B 4.0 759 759/940
105 Claude 3.5 Haiku 3.8 759 759/940
106 Microsoft Phi-4 3.4 759 759/940
107 GPT-4o mini 3.4 759 759/940
108 Mistral Small 3 3.0 601 601/940
109 GPT-4.1 nano 2.8 759 759/940
110 GLM4-32B-0414 2.7 759 759/940
111 Claude 3 Haiku 0.7 601 601/940

Notes

  • Claude Opus 4.7, Claude Opus 4.8 xhigh, MiMo v2.5 Pro, Qwen 3.7 Max, and Step 3.7 Flash high have counted refusals/content blocks; refused or blocked puzzles are scored as 0/4.
  • GLM-5.1 is the provider-default thinking run; GLM-5.2 entries with parenthetical reasoning labels use the stated reasoning setting.
  • Partial credit follows the scoring rule above, which more heavily rewards complete solves.
  • Only one attempt is allowed per puzzle. Humans solving puzzles on the NYT website get four attempts and a notification when they're one step away from the solution.
  • This benchmark is not affiliated with the New York Times

Other multi-agent benchmarks

Other benchmarks


Updates

  • August 4, 2026: Qwen 3.8 Max added. verified pricing and the Qwen 3.7 Max to 3.8 Max cost-chart arrow followed.
  • August 1, 2026: Gemini 3.6 Flash, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite high, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Qwen 3.7 Plus, and Qwen3.6-35B-A3B added; DeepSeek V4 Flash refreshed for V4-Flash-0731.
  • July 24, 2026: Claude Opus 5 high and xhigh added; headline scoring changed to quadratic-v1.
  • July 17, 2026: Kimi K3 added.
  • July 9, 2026: GPT-5.6 high/xhigh/Luna/Terra and Muse Spark 1.1 high added.
  • June 30, 2026: Claude Sonnet 5 high reasoning added.
  • June 19, 2026: GLM-5.2 high reasoning, Claude Fable 5, and MiniMax-M3 added.
  • May 29, 2026: Step 3.7 Flash added.
  • May 28, 2026: Claude Opus 4.8 added.
  • May 22, 2026: Qwen 3.7 Max added.
  • May 19, 2026: Gemini 3.5 Flash added.
  • May 12, 2026: Baidu ERNIE 5.1 added
  • May 1, 2026: Grok 4.3 added
  • April 29, 2026: Mistral Medium 3.5, Nemotron 3 Super added
  • April 25, 2026: GPT-5.5, Kimi K2.6, Ling 2.6 1T, Tencent Hy3 Preview, DeepSeek V4 Pro, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Qwen 3.6 Max Preview added.
  • April 16, 2026: Claude Opus 4.7 added.
  • April 15, 2026: GLM-5.1, Step 3.5 Flash, Qwen3.5-27B added.
  • April 6, 2026: GPT 5.4 (high), Gemma 4 31B Reasoning, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B added.
  • April 4, 2026: MiniMax-M2.7 added.
  • April 3, 2026: Arcee Trinity Large Thinking, Qwen 3.6 Plus, Gemma 4 31B added.
  • Mar 6, 2026: Grok 4.20 Beta Experminatal, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite Preview added.
  • Mar 5, 2026: GPT-5.4 added.
  • Feb 23, 2026: GLM-5 added.
  • Feb 20, 2026: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, ByteDance Seed2.0 Pro, Baidu Ernie 5.0 added.
  • Feb 17, 2026: Claude Sonnet 4.6, Qwen3.5-397B-A17B, MiniMax-M2.5 added.
  • Feb 6, 2026: Claude Opus 4.6 added.
  • Feb 2, 2026: 940 total puzzles. Kimi K2.5 Thinking, Qwen3 Max (2026-01-23), MiniMax-M2.1, DeepSeek V3.2 added.
  • Dec 17, 2025: Gemini 3 Flash Preview added.
  • Dec 12, 2025: GPT 5.2 xhigh, GPT 5.2 Pro added.
  • Dec 11, 2025: GPT 5.2 added.
  • Dec 2, 2025: Mistral Large 3 added.
  • Nov 24, 2025: Claude Opus 4.5 added.
  • Nov 21, 2025: Grok 4.1 Fast added.
  • Nov 18, 2025: Gemini 3 Pro Preview, GPT 5.1 added
  • Nov 12, 2025: Kimi K2 Thinking added.
  • Oct 15, 2025: Claude Haiku 4.5 added.
  • Oct 14, 2025: Claude Sonnet 4.5, Deepseek V3.2 Exp, GLM-4.6 added.
  • Sep 19, 2025: Grok 4 Fast, Qwen 3 Next 80B A3B Thinking, LongCat Flash Chat added.
  • Sep 6, 2025: Kimi K2-0905 added.
  • Sep 5, 2025: Qwen 3 Max Preview, Qwen 3 235B A22B 25-07 Instruct added.
  • Aug 23, 2025: GPT-5 high reasoning and Cohere Command A Reasoning (16K) added.
  • Aug 22, 2025: DeepSeek 3.1, Qwen 3 30B A3B 25-07, Mistral Medium 3.1, GPT-5 minimal and low reasoning added.
  • Aug 7, 2025: GPT-5 added.
  • Aug 5, 2025: Claude Opus 4.1, GPT-OSS-120B added.
  • July 28, 2025: GLM-4.5, Qwen 3 235B A22B 25-07 Thinking added.
  • July 14, 2025: 108 new puzzles added. Kimi K2 added.
  • July 10, 2025: Grok 4 added.
  • July 3, 2025: Qwen 3 32B, GLM4-32B-0414 added.
  • July 2, 2025: Baidu Ernie 4.5 300B A47B, MiniMax-M1, Mistral Small 3.2 added.
  • June 10, 2025: o3-pro added.
  • June 5, 2025: Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 added.
  • May 28, 2025: DeepSeek R1 05/28 added.
  • May 22, 2025: Claude 4 models added.
  • May 7, 2025: Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06 added. Mistral Medium 3 added.
  • Apr 30, 2025: Qwen 3 added.
  • Apr 18, 2025: o3, o4-mini, Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview added.
  • Apr 15, 2025: GPT-4.1 added.
  • Apr 10, 2025: Grok 3 added.
  • Apr 5, 2025: Llama 4 Maverick, Llama 4 Scout added.
  • Mar 28, 2025: GPT-4o March 2025 added.
  • Mar 25, 2025: 50 new questions added. Gemini 2.5 Pro Exp 03-25 and DeepSeek V3-0324 added.
  • Mar 23, 2025: Humans vs. LLMs section added.
  • Mar 21, 2025: o1-pro added. o3-mini-high added.
  • Mar 17, 2025: Cohere Command A and Mistral Small 3.1 added.
  • Mar 12, 2025: Gemma 3 27B added.
  • Mar 7, 2025: Qwen QwQ added.
  • Feb 27, 2025: GPT-4.5 Preview added.
  • Feb 24, 2025: Claude 3.7 Sonnet Thinking, Clade 3.7 Sonnet, GPT-4o Feb 2025, Qwen 2.5 Max, GPT-4o 2024-11-20 added.
  • Feb 6, 2025: Gemini 2.0 Pro Exp 02-05 added.
  • Feb 4, 2025: A new, more challenging version with extra words in each puzzle. Separate scoring for the 100 newest questions. Correlation heatmap.
  • Jan 31, 2025: o3-mini (72.4) added.
  • Jan 30, 2025: Mistral Small 3 (10.5) added.
  • Jan 29, 2025: DeepSeek R1 (54.5) added.
  • Jan 28, 2025: Qwen 2.5 Max (18.6) added.
  • Jan 22, 2025: Phi-4 (11.6), Nova Pro (12.5), Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Exp 01-21 (37.0) added.
  • Jan 16, 2025: Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Exp, o1, MiniMax-Tex-o1 added. Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Exp sometimes hits the output token limit.
  • Dec 27, 2024: GPT-4o 2024-11-20, Llama 3.3 70B, Gemini 2.0 Flash Exp, Deepseek-V3 added. Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Exp could not be benchmarked because its output gets cut off for some puzzles.
  • Claude 3.5 Haiku added. 13.7.
  • Claude 3.5 Sonnet (2024-10-22) added. Improves from 25.9 from 24.4.
  • Grok Beta added. Improves from 21.3 to 23.7. It's described as "experimental language model with state-of-the-art reasoning capabilities, best for complex and multi-step use cases. It is the successor of Grok 2 with enhanced context length."
  • Follow @lechmazur on X (Twitter) for other upcoming benchmarks and more.

About

Benchmark that evaluates LLMs using 759 NYT Connections puzzles extended with extra trick words

Topics

Resources

Stars

236 stars

Watchers

10 watching

Forks

Contributors

Languages