Skip to content

Add riscv64 (linux) to CSI_PROW_BUILD_PLATFORMS#300

Open
andyzhangx wants to merge 1 commit into
kubernetes-csi:masterfrom
andyzhangx:add-riscv64-support
Open

Add riscv64 (linux) to CSI_PROW_BUILD_PLATFORMS#300
andyzhangx wants to merge 1 commit into
kubernetes-csi:masterfrom
andyzhangx:add-riscv64-support

Conversation

@andyzhangx
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What type of PR is this?

/kind feature

What this PR does / why we need it:

Add linux riscv64 to the default CSI_PROW_BUILD_PLATFORMS in prow.sh so that all CSI sidecar repos that consume csi-release-tools automatically build and publish riscv64 images.

Now that riscv64 support is available for the distroless Docker base image (GoogleContainerTools/distroless#2001), riscv64 can be added as a supported architecture across the CSI ecosystem.

This was requested in:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Related to kubernetes-csi/livenessprobe#403
Related to kubernetes-csi/external-provisioner#1481

Special notes for your reviewer:

This is a one-line change to prow.sh line 81, adding linux riscv64 riscv64 -riscv64 to the platform list (following the same pattern as other architectures).

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

Support added for architecture riscv64 (linux) in CSI sidecar builds.

Now that riscv64 support is available for the distroless Docker
base image (GoogleContainerTools/distroless#2001), add linux/riscv64
to the default build platforms so all CSI sidecar repos pick it up
automatically.

Related: kubernetes-csi/livenessprobe#403
Related: kubernetes-csi/external-provisioner#1481
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. labels Apr 18, 2026
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: andyzhangx
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign saad-ali for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Apr 18, 2026
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Unknown CLA label state. Rechecking for CLA labels.

Send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/check-cla
/easycla

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Apr 18, 2026
@carlory
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

carlory commented Apr 20, 2026

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 20, 2026
@carlory
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

carlory commented Apr 20, 2026

/hold
for kubernetes/release#4303 (comment)

related to: kubernetes/release#4312

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Apr 20, 2026
@carlory
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

carlory commented Apr 20, 2026

/lgtm cancel

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 20, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants