Skip to content

Relationship queries: easier to scope/chain #131

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
dam13n wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Relationship queries: easier to scope/chain #131

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 3 additions & 1 deletion motion/cdq/relationship_query.rb
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -3,6 +3,8 @@ module CDQ

class CDQRelationshipQuery < CDQTargetedQuery

attr_reader :target_class

def initialize(owner, name, set = nil, opts = {})
@owner = owner ? WeakRef.new(owner) : nil
@relationship_name = name
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -132,7 +134,7 @@ def respond_to?(method)
end

def method_missing(method, *args, &block)
if @__query__.respond_to?(method)
if @__query__.target_class.respond_to?(method) || @__query__.respond_to?(method)
@__query__.send(method, *args, &block)
else
super
Expand Down
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions spec/cdq/relationship_query_spec.rb
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ class << self

it "should be able to use named scopes" do
cdq(@author).articles.all_published.array.should == [@article1, @article2, @article3]
@author.articles.all_published.array.should == [@article1, @article2, @article3]
end

it "can handle many-to-many correctly" do
Expand Down