Skip to content

BE-537: hgraph: REST /hashql endpoint with E2E tests#8827

Open
indietyp wants to merge 10 commits into
bm/be-592-hashql-remove-old-eval-graph-path-and-core-value-typesfrom
bm/be-537-hashql-remove-old-backend-wire-up-hashql-in-the-api
Open

BE-537: hgraph: REST /hashql endpoint with E2E tests#8827
indietyp wants to merge 10 commits into
bm/be-592-hashql-remove-old-eval-graph-path-and-core-value-typesfrom
bm/be-537-hashql-remove-old-backend-wire-up-hashql-in-the-api

Conversation

@indietyp

@indietyp indietyp commented Jun 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

Add first-class /hashql POST endpoint. HashQlResource with OpenApi integration. CompilerContext with HeapPool/ScratchPool for memory management. CLI-configurable pool sizes via CompilerConfig with PoolSize newtype. PostgresStorePool extraction pattern. Interactive and Json-Compat header support. E2E tests via httpYac.

Pre-Merge Checklist 🚀

🚢 Has this modified a publishable library?

This PR:

  • does not modify any publishable blocks or libraries, or modifications do not need publishing

📜 Does this require a change to the docs?

The changes in this PR:

  • are internal and do not require a docs change

🕸️ Does this require a change to the Turbo Graph?

The changes in this PR:

  • do not affect the execution graph

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings June 4, 2026 16:33
@vercel

vercel Bot commented Jun 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
hash Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jun 12, 2026 12:42pm
petrinaut Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jun 12, 2026 12:42pm
1 Skipped Deployment
Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
hashdotdesign-tokens Ignored Ignored Preview Jun 12, 2026 12:42pm

@cursor

cursor Bot commented Jun 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

PR Summary

Medium Risk
New arbitrary query execution path against Postgres with configurable (including unbounded) compiler memory/thread pools; compilation and SQL generation bugs could affect availability or load even though inputs are not yet exposed.

Overview
Adds a POST /hashql REST API that accepts a JExpr-encoded query (plus a required but currently empty inputs array), runs the full HashQL pipeline (parse → HIR/MIR → Postgres codegen), executes via the eval orchestrator against a pooled Postgres client, and returns a structured success envelope or compiler diagnostics.

Server wiring: startup builds a shared CompilerContext (bounded/unbounded heap & scratch pools, LocalPoolHandle + spawn_pinned for !Send compilation/execution) from new CLI CompilerConfig / PoolSize env vars. The REST router now also injects a raw PostgresStorePool (alongside the existing fetching store pool) and the compiler context as Axum extensions.

Response options: optional Interactive (HTML-rendered errors) and Json-Compat (plain JSON values) headers; OpenAPI documents the new HashQL tag and HashQlRequest schema. Minor fixes: empty Temporal host strings are ignored; PostgresStore exposes AsRef<Client> for eval; lowering uses sym::main.

Tests: httpYac tests/hashql.http covers happy path, parse errors, validation, json-compat, and interactive HTML errors.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit c541263. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) area/apps > hash* Affects HASH (a `hash-*` app) area/libs Relates to first-party libraries/crates/packages (area) type/eng > backend Owned by the @backend team area/tests New or updated tests area/apps area/apps > hash-graph labels Jun 4, 2026
@indietyp indietyp marked this pull request as draft June 4, 2026 16:34
@indietyp indietyp force-pushed the bm/be-592-hashql-remove-old-eval-graph-path-and-core-value-types branch from 1cadbdc to 37f6a80 Compare June 9, 2026 07:17
@indietyp indietyp force-pushed the bm/be-537-hashql-remove-old-backend-wire-up-hashql-in-the-api branch from 7dbae69 to 29597b3 Compare June 9, 2026 07:17
@vercel vercel Bot temporarily deployed to Preview – petrinaut June 9, 2026 07:21 Inactive

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 14 out of 16 changed files in this pull request and generated 3 comments.

Comment thread libs/@local/graph/api/src/rest/hashql/mod.rs
Comment thread libs/@local/graph/api/src/rest/hashql/mod.rs Outdated
Comment thread libs/@local/graph/api/src/rest/hashql/mod.rs

@cursor cursor Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes and found 1 potential issue.

There are 2 total unresolved issues (including 1 from previous review).

Fix All in Cursor

❌ Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with cloud agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 93fb60f. Configure here.

Comment thread libs/@local/graph/api/src/rest/hashql/mod.rs
Comment thread libs/@local/graph/api/src/rest/mod.rs Fixed
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings June 9, 2026 07:32
@indietyp indietyp force-pushed the bm/be-537-hashql-remove-old-backend-wire-up-hashql-in-the-api branch from 93fb60f to 77443ca Compare June 9, 2026 07:32
@indietyp indietyp force-pushed the bm/be-592-hashql-remove-old-eval-graph-path-and-core-value-types branch from 37f6a80 to ffd1eee Compare June 9, 2026 07:32
@vercel vercel Bot temporarily deployed to Preview – petrinaut June 9, 2026 07:35 Inactive

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 14 out of 16 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

Comment thread libs/@local/graph/api/src/rest/hashql/mod.rs
Comment thread libs/@local/graph/api/src/rest/hashql/mod.rs Outdated
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings June 9, 2026 09:48
@indietyp indietyp force-pushed the bm/be-592-hashql-remove-old-eval-graph-path-and-core-value-types branch from ffd1eee to c4c66ca Compare June 9, 2026 09:48
@indietyp indietyp force-pushed the bm/be-537-hashql-remove-old-backend-wire-up-hashql-in-the-api branch from 15bfd71 to 29a5989 Compare June 9, 2026 09:48
@indietyp indietyp force-pushed the bm/be-592-hashql-remove-old-eval-graph-path-and-core-value-types branch from c4c66ca to b71a649 Compare June 9, 2026 09:50

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 14 out of 16 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

Comment thread libs/@local/graph/api/src/rest/hashql/mod.rs

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 14 out of 16 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

Comment thread libs/@local/graph/api/src/rest/hashql/mod.rs
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002 $$26.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 258 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.49 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.38 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.315 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001 $$12.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 90.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.82 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314 $$43.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 370 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.065 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$14.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 99.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.061 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526 $$24.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 159 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.791 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078 $$26.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 164 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.081 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.75 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.900 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033 $$14.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 145 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.00 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102 $$3.70 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.244 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.97 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.787 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51 $$3.31 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.627 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269 $$5.12 \mathrm{ms} \pm 35.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.449 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.55 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.170 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107 $$4.06 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.879 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133 $$4.32 \mathrm{ms} \pm 29.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.710 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.48 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.754 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63 $$4.11 \mathrm{ms} \pm 35.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.29 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2 $$2.59 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.558 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.48 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.410 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1 $$2.60 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.55 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8 $$2.85 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.140 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.63 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.164 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3 $$2.85 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.269 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52 $$2.99 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.411 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.71 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.209 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25 $$2.96 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.574 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94 $$3.34 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.915 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.230 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26 $$3.25 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.684 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66 $$3.31 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.250 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.93 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.921 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29 $$3.30 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.965 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth 1 entities $$54.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 334 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.846 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 10 entities $$47.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 318 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.026 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 25 entities $$51.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 283 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.635 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 5 entities $$44.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 215 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.013 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 50 entities $$62.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 368 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.977 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 1 entities $$62.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 399 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.384 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 10 entities $$57.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 388 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.720 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 25 entities $$105 \mathrm{ms} \pm 625 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.214 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 5 entities $$46.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 225 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.337 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 50 entities $$294 \mathrm{ms} \pm 870 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.549 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 1 entities $$19.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 96.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.617 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 10 entities $$20.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 115 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.585 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 25 entities $$20.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 107 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.221 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 5 entities $$19.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 98.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.921 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 50 entities $$24.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 245 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.935 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 1 entities $$19.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 108 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.352 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$19.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 118 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.806 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 100 entities $$19.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 132 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.512 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1000 entities $$20.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 120 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.487 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10000 entities $$26.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 267 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.394 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1 $$35.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 298 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.28 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1 $$35.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 305 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.41 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1 $$35.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 296 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.68 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1 $$34.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 265 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.758 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2 $$34.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 295 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.186 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1 $$34.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 309 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.262 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1 $$36.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 301 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.27 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1 $$35.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 276 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.89 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1 $$35.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 259 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.818 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba $$8.42 \mathrm{ms} \pm 41.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.378 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_property traversal_paths=0 0 $$92.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 665 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.301 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=255 1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true $$148 \mathrm{ms} \pm 863 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.997 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false $$99.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 643 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.431 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$111 \mathrm{ms} \pm 634 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.299 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$117 \mathrm{ms} \pm 600 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.247 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$125 \mathrm{ms} \pm 635 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.635 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=0 0 $$103 \mathrm{ms} \pm 452 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.551 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=255 1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true $$133 \mathrm{ms} \pm 636 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.451 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false $$111 \mathrm{ms} \pm 575 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.228 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$120 \mathrm{ms} \pm 644 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.417 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$122 \mathrm{ms} \pm 664 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.514 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$121 \mathrm{ms} \pm 606 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.793 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
full_test query-limited $$189 \mathrm{ms} \pm 777 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.133 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
full_test query-unlimited $$150 \mathrm{ms} \pm 603 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.399 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
linked_queries query-limited $$40.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 201 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.510 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
linked_queries query-unlimited $$582 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.06 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}1.75 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 14 out of 16 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

Comment thread libs/@local/graph/api/src/rest/hashql/mod.rs
Comment thread apps/hash-graph/src/subcommand/server.rs
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area/apps > hash* Affects HASH (a `hash-*` app) area/apps > hash-graph area/apps area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) area/libs Relates to first-party libraries/crates/packages (area) area/tests New or updated tests type/eng > backend Owned by the @backend team

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants