Skip to content
Merged
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
127 changes: 127 additions & 0 deletions rules/integrations/aws/impact_lambda_high_frequency_invocation.toml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
[metadata]
creation_date = "2026/06/18"
integration = ["aws"]
maturity = "production"
updated_date = "2026/06/18"

[rule]
author = ["Elastic"]
description = """
Identifies a single principal directly invoking AWS Lambda functions at a high volume within a one-hour window.
Adversaries may drive excessive invocations to abuse functions for resource hijacking or cryptomining, to inflate costs
in a denial-of-wallet attack, or to enumerate function behavior. This is a volumetric heuristic: the threshold is
environment-dependent and high-throughput applications can exceed it, so tune it to the deployment. This rule relies on
AWS Lambda data event logging, which is not enabled by default.
"""
false_positives = [
"""
Legitimate high-throughput applications, batch jobs, load tests, and automation can invoke functions at high volume
and will exceed any fixed threshold. Validate the principal in `aws.cloudtrail.user_identity.arn` and the workload
context, and tune the threshold to the environment.
""",
]
from = "now-60m"
interval = "60m"
Comment thread
bryans3c marked this conversation as resolved.
Outdated
Comment thread
bryans3c marked this conversation as resolved.
Outdated
language = "esql"
license = "Elastic License v2"
name = "AWS Lambda Function High-Frequency Invocation by a Single Principal"
note = """## Triage and analysis

### Investigating AWS Lambda Function High-Frequency Invocation by a Single Principal

A principal issuing a high volume of direct Lambda invocations in a short window can indicate function abuse for resource hijacking or cryptomining, a denial-of-wallet cost attack, or behavioral enumeration. Because Lambda data events record only the invocation metadata (caller, function, source) and not the function's internal behavior, this rule is purely volumetric and should be treated as corroborating signal.

#### Possible investigation steps
Comment thread
bryans3c marked this conversation as resolved.
Outdated

- Identify the principal in `aws.cloudtrail.user_identity.arn` and determine whether the volume exceeds its historical baseline.
- Determine whether the principal is a known high-throughput application or automation identity, or an unexpected user.
- Review `source.ip` / `user_agent.original` and recent credential activity for signs of compromise.
- Correlate with billing/concurrency metrics and with other Lambda or IAM activity by the same principal.

### False positive analysis

- High-throughput apps, batch processing, and load tests routinely exceed fixed thresholds. Tune the threshold and exclude known high-volume identities after validation.

### Response and remediation

- If abuse is confirmed, throttle or disable the affected functions (reserved concurrency), rotate or restrict the principal's credentials, and review function code and execution-role permissions.
- Apply per-function reserved concurrency and account-level guardrails to bound cost and blast radius.

### Additional information

- [Logging Lambda data events with CloudTrail](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/lambda/latest/dg/logging-using-cloudtrail.html)
- [Lambda function scaling and concurrency](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/lambda/latest/dg/lambda-concurrency.html)
"""
references = [
"https://docs.aws.amazon.com/lambda/latest/dg/logging-using-cloudtrail.html",
"https://docs.aws.amazon.com/lambda/latest/dg/lambda-concurrency.html",
]
risk_score = 47
rule_id = "55260656-76d6-427b-bd02-7acdde131b64"
setup = """## Setup

This rule requires AWS Lambda data events to be logged in CloudTrail and ingested via the AWS integration. Lambda
invocation (`Invoke`) is a data-plane event and is NOT logged by default; enable data event logging for Lambda functions
in the trail (optionally scoped to sensitive functions to manage volume). Tune the invocation-count threshold in the
query to the environment before enabling.
"""
severity = "medium"
tags = [
"Domain: Cloud",
"Data Source: AWS",
"Data Source: Amazon Web Services",
"Data Source: AWS CloudTrail",
"Data Source: AWS Lambda",
"Use Case: Threat Detection",
Comment thread
Copilot marked this conversation as resolved.
"Tactic: Impact",
"Resources: Investigation Guide",
]
timestamp_override = "event.ingested"
type = "esql"

query = '''
from logs-aws.cloudtrail-*

// Lambda invocation data events (data-plane; requires data event logging enabled)
| where
event.provider == "lambda.amazonaws.com"
and event.action like "Invoke*"
and event.outcome == "success"
and aws.cloudtrail.user_identity.arn IS NOT NULL

| stats
Esql.invocation_count = count(*),
Esql.source_ips = values(source.ip)
by
aws.cloudtrail.user_identity.arn,
cloud.account.id
Comment thread
bryans3c marked this conversation as resolved.
Outdated

// Threshold is environment-dependent — tune to the deployment
| where Esql.invocation_count >= 1000
Comment thread
bryans3c marked this conversation as resolved.

| keep
aws.cloudtrail.user_identity.arn,
cloud.account.id,
Esql.invocation_count,
Esql.source_ips

| sort Esql.invocation_count desc
'''


[[rule.threat]]
framework = "MITRE ATT&CK"
[[rule.threat.technique]]
id = "T1496"
name = "Resource Hijacking"
reference = "https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1496/"


[rule.threat.tactic]
id = "TA0040"
name = "Impact"
reference = "https://attack.mitre.org/tactics/TA0040/"

[rule.investigation_fields]
field_names = ["aws.cloudtrail.user_identity.arn", "cloud.account.id", "Esql.invocation_count", "Esql.source_ips"]

Loading