XRT generalization#317
Draft
MTakahashi-KWH wants to merge 25 commits into
Draft
Conversation
… known stable mutation
…into XRT_generalization
…rd disk result caching (parallel improvment and mem/ipc stable)
|
Great job! No new security vulnerabilities introduced in this pull requestCommunicate with Checkmarx by submitting a PR comment with @Checkmarx followed by one of the supported commands. Learn about the supported commands here. |
Collaborator
Author
|
lol, i think the doc build fails cause i just dumped the xml in the doc directory to build the tutorial in ipynb ¯_(ツ)_/¯ |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.

Generalizing xrt backend to work with any arbitrary beamline setup through xml (json may well also be integrated easily).
Stable, with caching and greedy invalidation. Barebones demo notebook exists in markdown in tutorials. Most functionality outside of backend function is demoed.
this may be of interest to:
@jessica-moylan
@thopkins32
please let me know of any QOL or improvements preferred for this before i open a full pull request