Skip to content

Mistune toc / TableOfContents directive: heading IDs use predictable `toc_N` numbering with no slugification, allowing collision with attacker-controlled `id="toc_N"` content

Moderate severity GitHub Reviewed Published Jun 21, 2026 in lepture/mistune • Updated Jul 20, 2026

Package

pip mistune (pip)

Affected versions

< 3.3.0

Patched versions

3.3.0

Description

Summary

Type: Predictable identifier generation. The toc plugin and TableOfContents directive both default to generating heading IDs of the form toc_1, toc_2, toc_3, ... with no input-derived component. An attacker who can place a heading anywhere in the document can predict which toc_N ID it will receive, and can inject HTML elsewhere (in a non-heading context) that uses the same id="toc_N" to either (a) shadow the legitimate heading anchor, breaking same-page navigation, or (b) collide with CSS or JavaScript that targets #toc_N selectors, redirecting click handlers and styling to attacker-chosen content.
File: src/mistune/toc.py line 36-37 (heading_id = lambda token, index: "toc_" + str(index + 1)); src/mistune/directives/toc.py line 33 (same default).
Root cause: the default heading_id callback ignores the heading's text content and uses only the headings's order in the document. Two documents rendered together (or one document with attacker-influenced headings spliced into trusted content) produce overlapping toc_N IDs. Because id attribute uniqueness is required by HTML, browsers behaviour on duplicate IDs is undefined; document.getElementById('toc_1') returns the first match, getElementsByTagName + querySelector semantics differ across paths, and CSS rules targeting #toc_1 apply to whichever element matches first in tree order.

Affected Code

File: src/mistune/toc.py, lines 33-39.

def add_toc_hook(md, min_level=1, max_level=3, heading_id=None):
    if heading_id is None:
        def heading_id(token, index):
            return "toc_" + str(index + 1)               # <-- BUG: index-only ID, no slug derived from heading text

File: src/mistune/directives/toc.py, lines 32-33.

class TableOfContents(DirectivePlugin):
    def __init__(self, min_level=1, max_level=3):
        # ...

    def generate_heading_id(self, token, index):
        return "toc_" + str(index + 1)                   # <-- BUG: same predictable scheme

Why it's wrong: the standard markdown-engine convention (used by GitHub-flavoured Markdown, Sphinx, MkDocs, pandoc, every modern markdown renderer in production) is to slugify the heading TEXT for the ID — <h1 id="introduction">Introduction</h1> — with a numeric suffix appended only when slug collisions occur. mistune's default punts the slugification entirely and produces purely positional IDs that an attacker can predict in O(1).

The downstream impacts:

  • Same-page links with [click](#toc_1) go to whichever element with id="toc_1" appears first in tree order. If the attacker can land any HTML element with id="toc_1" before the real heading (via inline_html with escape=False, via the include-directive HTML branch, via attacker-supplied content earlier in the document), navigation is hijacked.
  • CSS rules targeting #toc_1 apply to the wrong element.
  • JavaScript bound to document.getElementById('toc_1') operates on the wrong element.
  • The TOC's own <a href="#toc_1"> link in the rendered TOC list points to whichever element wins the duplicate-ID race.

Exploit Chain

  1. Application uses mistune with add_toc_hook(md) or TableOfContents directive enabled (the documented setup for sites with TOC support).
  2. Application renders an attacker-supplied document, or splices attacker content into a trusted document. With escape=False (or via the include-directive .html branch covered by my prior advisory), the attacker can place <a id="toc_1">...</a> anywhere in the document.
  3. mistune assigns id="toc_1" to the first heading. Now there are two elements with id="toc_1" in the page.
  4. The rendered TOC contains <a href="#toc_1">First heading</a>. Clicking it navigates to whichever element with id="toc_1" appears first in tree order. If the attacker placed their <a id="toc_1"> BEFORE the heading, navigation is hijacked.
  5. Same-page CSS / JS / aria-described references to #toc_1 similarly redirect.

Security Impact

Severity: sec-low. Not a direct XSS or RCE; the issue is identifier confusion that enables UI-redirection / navigation-hijack attacks. The realistic attacker capability is "make an internal anchor link go to attacker content instead of the real heading", or "make a CSS selector apply to attacker content", or "break aria/screen-reader associations".
Attacker capability: with the ability to plant any HTML element with id="toc_N" in the document, hijack <a href="#toc_N"> navigation and any CSS/JS targeting that ID. With escape=False, this is straightforward. With escape=True, the attacker needs another vector to land a raw id attribute (one of the include-directive branches, a sibling tooling pipeline that lets HTML through, etc.).
Preconditions: application uses TOC + the default heading_id callback. If the application provides its own heading_id (e.g., one based on slugified heading text, with collision suffixes), this finding does not apply.
Differential: PoC-verified against mistune@3.2.1:

import mistune
from mistune.directives import RSTDirective, TableOfContents
md = mistune.create_markdown(plugins=[RSTDirective([TableOfContents()])])

print(md('''
.. toc::

# Heading 1

# Heading 2
'''))

# Output (note: id="toc_1" / id="toc_2", purely positional):
# <details class="toc" open>
#   <summary>Table of Contents</summary>
#   <ul>
#     <li><a href="#toc_1">Heading 1</a></li>
#     <li><a href="#toc_2">Heading 2</a></li>
#   </ul>
# </details>
# <h1 id="toc_1">Heading 1</h1>
# <h1 id="toc_2">Heading 2</h1>

The patched build (with the suggested fix below) produces text-derived slugs like id="heading-1" and id="heading-2", which are tied to content rather than position.

Suggested Fix

Default to slugifying the heading text:

--- a/src/mistune/toc.py
+++ b/src/mistune/toc.py
@@ -33,9 +33,18 @@ def add_toc_hook(md, min_level=1, max_level=3, heading_id=None):
     if heading_id is None:
+        import re
+        _slug_re = re.compile(r"[^a-z0-9]+")
+        seen = {}
         def heading_id(token, index):
-            return "toc_" + str(index + 1)
+            text = striptags(md.renderer(md.inline(token["text"], {}), BlockState()))
+            slug = _slug_re.sub("-", text.lower()).strip("-") or "section"
+            n = seen.get(slug, 0)
+            seen[slug] = n + 1
+            return slug if n == 0 else f"{slug}-{n}"

Same change applies to src/mistune/directives/toc.py:33. Existing applications that have hardcoded #toc_N anchors will break; document the migration in the changelog and consider providing an opt-out flag for the legacy behaviour. Add a regression test that asserts heading IDs are slug-derived, not position-derived, and that collisions get a -N suffix.

References

@lepture lepture published to lepture/mistune Jun 21, 2026
Published by the National Vulnerability Database Jul 8, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Jul 20, 2026
Reviewed Jul 20, 2026
Last updated Jul 20, 2026

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(9th percentile)

Weaknesses

Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity

The product does not sufficiently verify the origin or authenticity of data, in a way that causes it to accept invalid data. Learn more on MITRE.

Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input

The product receives input that is expected to specify a quantity (such as size or length), but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the quantity has the required properties. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-59930

GHSA ID

GHSA-2hm2-hc3v-44h9

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.