Skip to content

exp(glm45air): rubric monitoring/shaping configs (rlm + swe judges, research/glm-5.2)#2997

Draft
mikasenghaas wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
exp/glm45air-rubric-monitor
Draft

exp(glm45air): rubric monitoring/shaping configs (rlm + swe judges, research/glm-5.2)#2997
mikasenghaas wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
exp/glm45air-rubric-monitor

Conversation

@mikasenghaas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Rubric-judge ablations on configs/glm45air/swe.toml (GLM-4.5-Air on scaleswe, eval on SWE-Bench-Verified), attaching the rlm (harness-mechanics) + swe (code-usage) rubric judges from research-environments, judged by research/glm-5.2.

config train judges eval judges effect
configs/glm45air/swe_rubric_monitor.toml rlm + swe, weight 0 rlm + swe, weight 0 pure monitoring — emits rlm/* + swe/* metrics, no reward effect
configs/glm45air/swe_rubric_shaped.toml rlm + swe, weight 0.1 rlm + swe, weight 0 shapes the train reward (each rubric +0.1) + same metrics

Identical except the train judge weight (0 vs 0.1). Eval judges are weight-0 in both (eval isn't trained).

⚠️ Judge model not reachable yet: research/glm-5.2 returns HTTP 404 on the default Prime inference endpoint (as do all GLM-5.2 id variants; /models is 403). These configs won't run until that model is accessible (access grant, or a base_url/api-key override for the research server).

mikasenghaas and others added 2 commits July 10, 2026 22:13
Based on configs/glm45air/swe.toml, attaching rlm + swe rubric judges (GLM-5.2 on
default Prime inference) to the scaleswe train env:
- swe_rubric_monitor.toml: weight=0 (metric-only monitoring; emits rlm/*, swe/*)
- swe_rubric_shaped.toml:  weight=0.1 (shapes reward alongside the task reward)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
…nitors

- judge model -> research/glm-5.2 (default Prime inference)
- add rlm + swe rubric judges (weight 0) on the swebench-verified eval env in both configs

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant