Role: prosecution beamline
Purpose: Collect, test, and publish the strongest good-faith case that exclusion is justified by a substantiated pattern of harmful behavior.
Status: scaffolded 2026-06-17. Public by design; public-safe by rule. Visibility is part of the distribution strategy, but private material remains excluded or redacted.
A beamline is a focused adversarial evidence path. Each beamline turns a question into:
- claims;
- evidence receipts;
- counter-evidence receipts;
- uncertainty notes;
- weekly status;
- final argument.
The trial repository compares beamlines and records the final resolution.
Every evidence entry should answer:
- What is being claimed?
- Who is making the claim?
- What evidence supports it?
- What context could change interpretation?
- What would falsify or weaken it?
- What is private/redacted and why?
case/ case metadata and clock
docket/ weekly docket and issue list
evidence/ public-safe evidence receipts, not raw private dumps
arguments/ opening, weekly, final arguments
findings/ proposed findings or verdict drafts
schemas/ JSON schemas for receipts
templates/ reusable submission templates
This repository is public because the relevant reputational process already happened in public. The purpose is not to intensify punishment or launder a counter-mob. The purpose is to replace default-guilty social compression with a shared evidence block and competing, inspectable beamlines.
Public does not mean unrestricted. Private personal data, unrelated identity material, private contact information, and non-consensual material do not belong here. Redacted summaries and custody/hash receipts belong here when private material is relevant but cannot be published safely.
The neutral trial process should produce one shared t=0 evidence block. This repo's job is to interpret that block from its assigned role, not to invent a private starting reality.