Skip to content

feature: add Dokku deployment#2500

Open
willismonroe wants to merge 1 commit into
GetPublii:masterfrom
willismonroe:dokku-deployment
Open

feature: add Dokku deployment#2500
willismonroe wants to merge 1 commit into
GetPublii:masterfrom
willismonroe:dokku-deployment

Conversation

@willismonroe
Copy link
Copy Markdown

I've added a back-end module for deployment to a dokku instance.

I've tested it locally and it works.

@YasharF
Copy link
Copy Markdown

YasharF commented Feb 11, 2026

Just sharing a user perspective here, not speaking as a maintainer.

One thing to consider with adding first‑class Dokku support is the long‑term maintenance cost once it's merged. From what I’ve seen, Dokku users tend to be fairly DevOps‑savvy, and many already deploy via simple SSH/git or small custom scripts.

It might be worth weighing whether this belongs as core functionality versus something documented as an example of using SSH/git for deployment or such, to avoid increasing the ongoing maintenance surface.

@willismonroe
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

I agree with you in principle, certainly for me setting up a git workflow would be no issue. But this PR was inspired by my wife working on a website for herself that I'm hosting via a Dokku instance. That way I can configure it for her and it'll work when she pushes the sync button.

I could see then a client type relationship where you give someone the details for the deployment dialog so they can push to your server without having to worry about the commandline.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants