State of Erlang Editor Support Survey February 2017

• Survey 2016
• Survey 2017

If you voted "Other IDEs", what are they? Or anything else you expect in an IDE for Erlang? (Optional)

• sublimetext
• Acme - see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acme_(text_editor)
• Refactoring & find references would be good, but currently nothing supports it adequately out of the box.
• Good search facilities, easy interaction with other programs
• I am using Atom
• nano
• Vim not with VimErl, but a different set of plugins: scrooloose/syntastic for error checking Valloric/YouCompleteMe code completion
• I voted for IntelliJ and sublime
• I would not want a specific IDE for Erlang rather a strong integration with preexisting editors/IDE, in my case Erlang
• Visual Studio code. Elixir plugin can do some Erlang
• The zero's would be awesome to have, but are not a deal breaker, even though I would be estatic to be shown how they could work in Vim.
• Fast. Easy to use with terminal/tmux, shell utilities
• I use emacs and erlang-mode but EDTS on top of it. Which btw is an actual IDE.
• You need an IDE for Java due to its moronic commingling of language features and directory structure. You don't need an IDE for Erlang.
• Vscode
• Other IDE: neovim Features: - remote shell into running node - git integration
• spacemacs with vim emulation and erlang layer
• Spacemacs
• • display unified documentation from all sources (edoc, specs, comments)
• I'm OK with Vim/Emacs, but for beginners more "modern" IDEs look appropriate. VScode, Atom, IntelliJ, and others look nice.
• N/A
• I love Sublime.
• visual studio code
• n/a
• none
• no
• command line su editing occasionali sublimetext
• autocomplete and code format are really important thing IMO
• Jetbrains is just fine, except for the part when you can not do complex debug like process message tracking and stuffs like so.
• I use geany for Linux . Hot code loading of code integrated in an IDE would be cool .
• .
• live template
• VS Code
• Visual Studio Code
• Plain sublime
• The IDE should be cross-platform.
• I don't IDE, I prefer code editor + shell. Features that make editing code easier are good for an editor, other tools belong in the shell.
• supervision tree visualisation would be amazing!
• Syntax highlighting and error detection are most important. Completion is next and everything else is just gravy.
• I use vscode.
• Nothing else.
• To not be an IDE.
• visual code
• I'm writing my own - https://github.com/gasparch/vim-ide-elixir . Check it out and promote :)
• I'm writing my own https://github.com/gasparch/vim-ide-elixir . Check it out and promote :)
• Visual studio code
• EDTS
• EDTS, an emacs based Erlang editor developed in Klarna.
• vscode
• Nope
• I am not an emacs person. But I would love to see a rabar3/hex aware IDE with better features than IntelliJ.
• Sometimes use nano on the remote side
• hi
• Intellisense for functions, keywords,etc.
• gedit, kate
• It seems I cannot leave this field blank.
• I hope your project works....
• Emacs style incremental search and powerful text editing commands.
• Monitoring running node tools are important too.