"Like a good council, Divinci is there... generating content at 2 AM while you sleep." — Sir Spamalot
A multi-persona deliberation pipeline that transforms blog posts into platform-native content and reviews code architecture and generates comedic scripts about AI industry mishaps. Runs on local Ollama, cloud APIs, or your current Hermes session.
Think of it as a writers' room that happens to include a Renaissance inventor, an Atlantean archivist, a viral growth hacker, a LinkedIn thought leader, a VEO director, a Monty Python parodist, a brand guardian, and now — a code review cursor.
SKILL.md · v3.0 Release Notes · The Show
# Clone into your Hermes skills directory
git clone https://github.com/Divinci-AI/divinci-council.git \
~/.hermes/skills/creative/divinci-council
# Or run standalone
cd divinci-council
cp templates/council.yaml ./council.yaml
cp templates/brand-guide.md ./brand-guide.md
# Edit council.yaml with your project settings
python3 scripts/orchestrator.py --batch 001Prerequisites: Python 3.10+, PyYAML, and at least one backend:
- Ollama running locally (recommended for bulk)
- OpenCode CLI for cloud models
- cursor-agent for code review
- Or just use Hermes native — no extra installs
The council reads your blog posts and generates:
| Output | Count | Personas |
|---|---|---|
| Tweets | 7-15 | Leonardo, Archivist, Gemma4, Growth Hacker, Sir Spamalot |
| LinkedIn Posts | 2 | Thought Leader |
| VEO3.1 Scripts | 3 | VEO Director, Sir Spamalot (parody) |
| Show Scenes | ∞ | All 9 (diegetic content for "The Release Cycle") |
And now in v3.0:
| Output | Trigger | Personas |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | --code-review file.py |
The Cursor |
| Architecture Review | --architecture-review |
The Cursor + Leonardo + Thought Leader |
| Meta-Review | --meta-review |
Brand Guardian synthesizes all 9 lenses |
| Self-Reflection | After N batches | Council reviews its own outputs and methodology |
Every piece of content is reviewed by the Brand Guardian for forbidden words, tone consistency, and thematic motifs.
| Member | Voice | Specialty |
|---|---|---|
| Leonardo | Renaissance inventor sketching flying machines | Conceptual hooks, architectural insights |
| Atlantean Archivist | Keeper of crystal-memory, speaks in harmonics | Poetic-prophetic framing, lower-case flow |
| Gemma4 | Earnest junior engineer, Star Wars references | Open-weights perspective, edge-case hunter |
| Viral Growth Hacker | Engagement-obsessed X native | Algorithm-aware virality optimization |
| LinkedIn Thought Leader | Contrarian-but-helpful executive | Data-dense long-form authority posts |
| VEO3.1 Director | Thinks in shots, beats, visual gags | Timestamped video scripts, no lip-sync |
| Sir Spamalot | Monty Python + State Farm parody genius | Absurdist, legally-safe transformative parody |
| Brand Guardian | Sober final check | Quality gates, forbidden-word enforcement, security |
| The Cursor (NEW in v3.0) | Precision instrument, diff-native | Code review, refactoring, architecture deliberation |
Each member can be routed to a different model backend. Leonardo runs on your laptop via Ollama. The Cursor delegates to cursor-agent CLI. The Brand Guardian uses whatever deep-reasoning model your Hermes session provides.
The council now reviews code, not just prose:
# Review specific files with The Cursor
python3 scripts/orchestrator.py --code-review src/api.py src/models.py
# Get architecture assessment
python3 scripts/orchestrator.py --architecture-reviewThe Cursor checks for bugs, security vulnerabilities, performance issues, missing error handling, and test coverage gaps. Every finding includes line numbers, severity (CRITICAL/WARNING/SUGGESTION), and proposed fixes.
Safety rule: The council advises; humans decide. No auto-deployment. No "fix it for me" mode. The Cursor reports; you refactor.
After every 5 batches or 3 code reviews, the council can review itself:
# Meta-review: all 9 members assess the skill repository
python3 scripts/orchestrator.py --meta-reviewEach member contributes from their lens:
- Leonardo assesses structural elegance
- The Cursor hunts technical debt
- Brand Guardian checks for failure modes
- Sir Spamalot... makes sure we're still funny
Output: a prioritized improvement plan with specific file references. See meta_review/ for an example.
The council evaluates its own capabilities and explores new methodologies. The self_reflection config in council.yaml lets you set trigger thresholds, review questions, and output formats.
This skill has a second life as the content engine behind "The Release Cycle," a workplace mockumentary in the style of Silicon Valley (HBO) meets The Office.
The premise: Every piece of content the council generates is also canon in the show. The tutorial videos, parody ads, and LinkedIn posts created by the pipeline are the same ones the fictional Divinci team creates on-screen. The council IS the show's writers' room.
Real stories, alt reality: The show tells actual Divinci AI stories — customer demos that flopped, advisor meetings that went sideways, team members debugging at 3 AM, "building in public" mishaps — through a comedic lens. The AI industry news (Starbucks rolling back AI, Klarna's AI customer service, Salesforce rehiring humans) becomes fodder for the show's fictional news parodies.
Characters: The council personas map directly to show characters:
- Trevor (Content Strategist) channels Leonardo
- The Laptop (literal laptop on table) IS Gemma4
- Priya (Growth Lead) runs the Growth Hacker playbook
- Margaret (Marketing) gradually becomes Sir Spamalot
- Jordan (Brand Manager) enforces the forbidden words list
See references/show-integration.md for the full mapping and references/AI_INCIDENTS_REFERENCE.md for the real-world comedy source material.
project_name: "Divinci AI"
source_domain: "https://divinci.ai/blog"
models:
ollama_local:
type: ollama
url: http://localhost:11434/api/generate
model: gemma4:latest
cursor_agent:
type: cursor
cli_path: /Users/mikeumus/.local/bin/cursor-agent
reasoning_model: ollama_local
personas:
leonardo:
model: ollama_local
temperature: 0.9
cursor:
model: cursor_agent
coding:
enabled: true
review_paths:
- ./src
- ./scripts
review_depth: comprehensive # quick | standard | comprehensive
self_reflection:
enabled: true
trigger_after_batches: 5
trigger_after_code_reviews: 3
questions:
- "What patterns are emerging in our outputs?"
- "Which personas are most/least effective?"
- "Are our coding reviews catching real issues?"Full template: templates/council.yaml
The council enforces your brand rules automatically:
brand:
forbidden_words:
- "revolutionary"
- "game-changing"
- "disruptive"
required_motifs:
- "golden spiral"
- "crystal lattice"
- "solar abundance"
character_desc: "Young Leonardo da Vinci sketching robots at a cleanroom bench"Full template: templates/brand-guide.md
| Backend | Speed | Cost | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ollama | ~30s/persona | Free | Bulk content, local privacy |
| OpenCode | ~15s/persona | Free/Paid | Fast cloud generation |
| Hermes Native | Instant | Session cost | Complex reasoning, Brand Guardian |
| cursor-agent | ~60s/file | Cursor sub | Code review, refactoring |
| API (OpenAI/Anthropic) | ~10s/persona | Per-token | High-quality output |
Mix and match per persona. Leonardo and Gemma4 run locally. The Cursor uses cursor-agent. Brand Guardian uses your Hermes session. No single vendor lock-in.
{
"source_post": { "url": "...", "title": "...", "word_count": 4200 },
"council_run": {
"run_id": "2026-06-01T07-45-00Z",
"council_version": "3.0",
"deliberation": true,
"models_used": ["ollama_local", "hermes_native"]
},
"tweets": [...],
"linkedin_posts": [...],
"veo_scripts": [...],
"persona_outputs": { "leonardo": "...", "archivist": "..." },
"brand_guardian_review": "APPROVED"
}- No auto-deployment. The council generates; humans decide.
- No secrets in prompts. API keys are env vars only.
- Input validation. Config paths are validated before shell execution.
- Security scan. Run
grep -ri "password\|token\|secret" .before committing. - Backup configs. The skill creates
.bakfiles before editing OpenCode configs.
See references/opencode-config-fix.md for an example of safe config management.
The council reviewed itself in v3.0 and found:
Critical: Zero unit tests on the 1041-line orchestrator.
Critical: cursor-agent path needs validation.
High: Shared HTTP logic should be extracted.
Medium: No file size limits for code review.
Full report: meta_review/meta_review_20260601_074500.md
This is the first open-source project where the maintainers are also the primary QA team... and they happen to be fictional.
The council accepts contributions from humans and other LLMs. To contribute:
- Fork the repository
- Create a new council member in
personas/(optional) - Add your backend to
scripts/orchestrator.py - Run
python3 scripts/orchestrator.py --meta-reviewto let the council review your changes - Open a PR with the council's feedback attached
Code of conduct: Be excellent to each other. The Archivist is watching.
MIT — Use it for your startup, your podcast, your TV show, or your personal blog. Just don't say it was "revolutionary." The Brand Guardian will find you.
Built by Divinci AI. The council deliberates; humans decide.