Problem
The English AJV card-printing rows do not include TCGplayer product IDs. TCGplayer group 23771 contains products for AJV001–AJV027, but those IDs are absent from csvs/english/card-printing.csv and the generated JSON.
This prevents consumers from joining AJV card identities to TCGplayer pricing. AJV-exclusive cards such as these currently cannot be priced through the dataset:
- AJV006 Gauntlets of the Boreal Domain → product 593961
- AJV013 Unforgetting Unforgiving → product 587213
- AJV018 Crumble to Eternity → product 587215
- AJV020 Frozen to Death → product 593966
Proposed data change
Populate the existing TCGplayer product IDs for:
- 27 collector numbers, AJV001–AJV027
- 31 printing rows in total, because AJV013, AJV017, AJV018, and AJV020 each have Normal and Rainbow Foil rows sharing one product ID
AJV028–AJV030 are tokens without TCGplayer products and should remain blank.
Source note
TCGplayer currently labels Mangle and Strong Yield as AJC011 and AJC024, although the card images show AJV011 and AJV024. I submitted product-detail correction reports for both listings; their product IDs are 596250 and 596302.
I'd like to work on this and have a locally generated and schema-validated patch ready. Could I please be assigned to this issue?
Problem
The English AJV card-printing rows do not include TCGplayer product IDs. TCGplayer group 23771 contains products for AJV001–AJV027, but those IDs are absent from
csvs/english/card-printing.csvand the generated JSON.This prevents consumers from joining AJV card identities to TCGplayer pricing. AJV-exclusive cards such as these currently cannot be priced through the dataset:
Proposed data change
Populate the existing TCGplayer product IDs for:
AJV028–AJV030 are tokens without TCGplayer products and should remain blank.
Source note
TCGplayer currently labels Mangle and Strong Yield as
AJC011andAJC024, although the card images showAJV011andAJV024. I submitted product-detail correction reports for both listings; their product IDs are 596250 and 596302.I'd like to work on this and have a locally generated and schema-validated patch ready. Could I please be assigned to this issue?