-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 258
Fix getprotobyname missing on Android preventing use #470
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
Paliak
wants to merge
6
commits into
schweikert:develop
Choose a base branch
from
Paliak:fix-getprotobyname-android
base: develop
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+34
−14
Open
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
9d07f0c
FIX: getprotobyname missing on Android preventing use
Paliak 85ee18b
Fix formatting in socket6.c
Paliak be8cc59
FIX: use existing OS detection for USE_GETPROTOBYNAME
Paliak 0d09161
FIX: use value returned by getprotobyname when it is enabled
Paliak c2f67d0
Merge branch 'fix-getprotobyname-android' of https://github.com/Palia…
Paliak cb15cc5
MISC: remove extra new line
Paliak File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Some comments aren't visible on the classic Files Changed page.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is the
--disable-getprotobynameflag really necessary? If not, then an attempt should be made to perform an automatic check.For example, using
AC_CHECK_FUNCS()There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This was the most portable way i could think of implementing this.
AC_CHECK_FUNCSwill return true on Android asgetprotobynamedoes exist. It just always returns NULL. The only automatic way to check this that i know of would be to useAC_RUN_IFELSEbut i decided against that as i feel it would be quite messy (and maybe cause issues with cross compilation). I guess the flag could just be removed altogether as#if !(defined(ANDROID) || defined(__ANDROID__))would suffice for what this PR is trying to accomplish.Just thought that it could be a nice to have.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In that case, it would be better to move the Android detection to
configure.ac. We already have thecase "${target}" infunction, and if other systems use the same approach, it can be extended quite easily.This keeps the exception in the code itself more flexible.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Implemented in be8cc59 let me know what you think.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would first check whether
getprotobynameis present, and then check whether it needs to be disabled again.Here's my example: