We currently have lots of learning goals that clearly violate principles of "good learning goals" -
e.g. missing active verbs, unclear formulation of what the outcome is etc.
Therefore Alexander @alxlo and Gernot propose to add in internally used metric for every LG that indicates
how good a particular learning goal is from a purely didactical perspective.
First we need to define this metric, that have (e.g. three different LLMs) apply them to all LGs.
Those LGs with lowest scores should be overhauled in wording and or preciseness.
We currently have lots of learning goals that clearly violate principles of "good learning goals" -
e.g. missing active verbs, unclear formulation of what the outcome is etc.
Therefore Alexander @alxlo and Gernot propose to add in internally used metric for every LG that indicates
how good a particular learning goal is from a purely didactical perspective.
First we need to define this metric, that have (e.g. three different LLMs) apply them to all LGs.
Those LGs with lowest scores should be overhauled in wording and or preciseness.