fix(extract): read "governed under", "controlled by", and doublet gov-law

Three governing-law phrasings that CHOICE-001 read as "no governing-law clause"
because the GOV_LAW anchor never reached "the laws of X":

- `governed under the laws of X` — GOVERNED_BY allowed only the `by`
  preposition; added `under` (same clause, different preposition).
- `controlled by the laws of X` — added `controlled by` to the verb set. It
  still requires "the laws of" to follow, so corporate control ("controlled by
  Beta Holdings") is not mistaken for a governing-law clause.
- `governed by, and enforced under, the laws of X` — the intervening
  verb+preposition doublet sat between the first verb and "the laws of"; the
  old pattern accepted only "and construed in accordance with". Generalized to
  `and (construed|enforced|interpreted|governed) (in accordance with|under|by)`.

Zero golden churn (no corpus fixture uses these forms). Decoy guards: a
disclaimed "not governed by", an ordinary "operates under the laws of", and
corporate "controlled by X" stay unmatched. 6 regression tests.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Author: clay-good

README.md

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 
 **Vaulytica is the second pair of eyes you can cite.**
 
-`1,111 deterministic rules` · `20 cross-document checks` · `5 pre-disclosure checks` · `3 execution-readiness reconciliations` · `5 derived-deadline families` · `16 document sub-domains` · `88 state-law overlays (non-compete · security deposit · usury · will formalities)` · `10 export formats` · `0 servers` · `0 AI` · `5,843 passing tests` · `v9.41.0` · `MIT`
+`1,111 deterministic rules` · `20 cross-document checks` · `5 pre-disclosure checks` · `3 execution-readiness reconciliations` · `5 derived-deadline families` · `16 document sub-domains` · `88 state-law overlays (non-compete · security deposit · usury · will formalities)` · `10 export formats` · `0 servers` · `0 AI` · `5,849 passing tests` · `v9.41.0` · `MIT`
 
 ![Vaulytica landing page — "Drop legal docs. Get a report. Nothing leaves your browser."](docs/images/hero.png)
 
@@ -1332,7 +1332,7 @@ npm run dev          # open the printed URL
 npm run build        # static site → dist/
 npm run typecheck    # tsc --noEmit
 npm run lint         # eslint
-npm run test         # vitest — 5,843 tests, ~35s
+npm run test         # vitest — 5,849 tests, ~35s
 npm run coverage     # vitest + V8 coverage, enforces the regression floor
 npm run accuracy     # v5 Ground Truth harness → tools/accuracy/SCOREBOARD.md
 npm run mutation     # Stryker mutation score (scoped to extractors; slow, off the per-push path)

src/extract/govlaw-phrasing.test.ts

@@ -20,13 +20,30 @@ const REGISTERS: Array<[clause: string, want: RegExp]> = [
   // The elliptical "that of" statement form, where "that" == "the law".
   ["The governing law shall be that of the State of Texas.", /Texas/],
   ["The governing law is that of New York.", /New York/],
+  // `under` as the preposition, `controlled by` as the verb, and an intervening
+  // "and <verb> <prep>," doublet between the first verb and "the laws of".
+  ["This Agreement shall be governed under the laws of the State of Oregon.", /Oregon/],
+  ["This Agreement shall be controlled by the laws of the State of Arizona.", /Arizona/],
+  [
+    "This Agreement shall be governed by, and enforced under, the laws of the State of Nevada.",
+    /Nevada/,
+  ],
+  [
+    "This Agreement shall be governed by and interpreted under the laws of Washington.",
+    /Washington/,
+  ],
 ];
 
 // Decoys: an adjective before "laws" must not turn a non-choice-of-law phrase
 // into a jurisdiction, and a non-jurisdiction "laws of X" must stay unmatched.
 const NO_GOV_LAW: string[] = [
   "The parties shall comply with the applicable laws of any jurisdiction in which they operate.",
   "Nothing herein alters the immutable laws of physics governing the equipment.",
+  // "controlled by X" is corporate control, not a governing-law verb, unless
+  // "the laws of" follows immediately.
+  "Acme is controlled by Beta Holdings under the laws of Delaware for tax purposes.",
+  // A disclaimed governing law must stay unmatched.
+  "This Agreement shall not be governed by the laws of the State of New York.",
 ];
 
 describe("governing-law phrasing guard", () => {

src/extract/jurisdictions.ts

@@ -59,10 +59,18 @@ const SOVEREIGN_PREFIX = String.raw`the\s+(?:State|Commonwealth|Republic|Kingdom
 // exclusively by", "governed solely by" — and the rigid "governed\s+by" token
 // dropped the whole clause, so CHOICE-001 reported "no governing-law clause" on
 // a document that plainly names one. The adverb is optional and does not change
-// the clause's meaning, so this only widens what matches.
-const GOVERNED_BY = String.raw`governed\s+(?:(?:exclusively|solely|only|entirely)\s+)?by`;
+// the clause's meaning, so this only widens what matches. `under` joins `by` as
+// the preposition — "governed under the laws of X" is the same clause as
+// "governed by the laws of X".
+const GOVERNED_BY = String.raw`governed\s+(?:(?:exclusively|solely|only|entirely)\s+)?(?:by|under)`;
+// The intervening doublet — "governed by, and construed in accordance with, the
+// laws of X" / "governed by, and enforced under, the laws of X". The second
+// verb+preposition sits between the first verb and "the laws of"; without this
+// optional clause the anchor never reached "the laws of" and the whole
+// governing-law clause was read as absent.
+const GOV_LAW_DOUBLET = String.raw`(?:and\s+(?:construed|enforced|interpreted|governed)\s+(?:in\s+accordance\s+with|under|by)\s*,?\s*)?`;
 const GOV_LAW = new RegExp(
-  String.raw`\b((?:${GOVERNED_BY}|(?:interpreted|construed|resolved)\s+(?:under|in\s+accordance\s+with)|subject\s+to|determined\s+(?:under|by|in\s+accordance\s+with))\s*,?\s*(?:and\s+construed\s+(?:in\s+accordance\s+with\s*,?\s*)?)?the\s+(?:substantive\s+|internal\s+|domestic\s+|local\s+|applicable\s+)*laws?\s+of\s+(?:${SOVEREIGN_PREFIX})?([A-Z][A-Za-z\s&-]+?))(?=[.,;)]|\s+(?:without|excluding|and|regardless)|$)`,
+  String.raw`\b((?:${GOVERNED_BY}|controlled\s+by|(?:interpreted|construed|resolved)\s+(?:under|in\s+accordance\s+with)|subject\s+to|determined\s+(?:under|by|in\s+accordance\s+with))\s*,?\s*${GOV_LAW_DOUBLET}the\s+(?:substantive\s+|internal\s+|domestic\s+|local\s+|applicable\s+)*laws?\s+of\s+(?:${SOVEREIGN_PREFIX})?([A-Z][A-Za-z\s&-]+?))(?=[.,;)]|\s+(?:without|excluding|and|regardless)|$)`,
   "gi",
 );