@mhatrevi
Since we're moving towards SPDM-VDM and the standard MCI Mailbox interface will continue to be available, we'd still have two supported access paths for command execution. Given that both MCTP-VDM and SPDM-VDM use MCTP as the underlying transport, does MCTP-VDM provide enough unique value to justify maintaining a separate implementation, or should we consider removing it to simplify the architecture?
@mhatrevi
Since we're moving towards SPDM-VDM and the standard MCI Mailbox interface will continue to be available, we'd still have two supported access paths for command execution. Given that both MCTP-VDM and SPDM-VDM use MCTP as the underlying transport, does MCTP-VDM provide enough unique value to justify maintaining a separate implementation, or should we consider removing it to simplify the architecture?