-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 81
Expand file tree
/
Copy path8x6l.txt
More file actions
574 lines (483 loc) · 26.8 KB
/
Copy path8x6l.txt
File metadata and controls
574 lines (483 loc) · 26.8 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
sbc-bench v0.9.71 Hardkernel ODROID-C5 (Tue, 27 May 2025 14:59:51 +0000)
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description: Ubuntu 22.04.5 LTS
Release: 22.04
Codename: jammy
/usr/bin/gcc (Ubuntu 11.4.0-1ubuntu1~22.04) 11.4.0
Uptime: 14:59:51 up 1 day, 47 min, 3 users, load average: 0.08, 0.05, 0.27, 38.6°C, 178400784
Linux 5.15.153-odroid-arm64 (server) 05/27/25 _aarch64_ (4 CPU)
avg-cpu: %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle
0.30 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.00 99.48
Device tps kB_read/s kB_wrtn/s kB_dscd/s kB_read kB_wrtn kB_dscd
mmcblk0 0.34 5.12 4.81 0.00 456594 428960 0
total used free shared buff/cache available
Mem: 3.6Gi 222Mi 3.3Gi 1.0Mi 90Mi 3.2Gi
Swap: 0B 0B 0B
##########################################################################
Checking cpufreq OPP (Cortex-A55):
Cpufreq OPP: 2508 Measured: 2498 (2498.132/2498.038/2498.007)
Cpufreq OPP: 2400 Measured: 2390 (2390.732/2390.253/2390.193)
Cpufreq OPP: 2304 Measured: 2294 (2295.283/2294.651/2293.847)
Cpufreq OPP: 2208 Measured: 2198 (2199.692/2198.288/2198.068)
Cpufreq OPP: 2004 Measured: 1995 (1996.552/1995.350/1995.049)
Cpufreq OPP: 1800 Measured: 1790 (1790.872/1790.671/1790.492)
Cpufreq OPP: 1608 Measured: 1599 (1599.916/1599.348/1598.923)
Cpufreq OPP: 1404 Measured: 1394 (1395.007/1394.990/1394.920)
Cpufreq OPP: 1200 Measured: 1191 (1191.370/1191.281/1191.221)
Cpufreq OPP: 1000 Measured: 991 (991.938/991.913/991.593)
Cpufreq OPP: 666 Measured: 658 (659.650/658.715/658.607) (-1.2%)
Cpufreq OPP: 500 Measured: 492 (493.016/492.209/492.147) (-1.6%)
Cpufreq OPP: 250 Measured: 242 (243.248/242.384/241.280) (-3.2%)
Cpufreq OPP: 100 Measured: 92 (93.372/92.477/90.635) (-8.0%)
##########################################################################
Executing benchmark on cpu0 (Cortex-A55):
tinymembench v0.4.9-nuumio (simple benchmark for memory throughput and latency)
CFLAGS:
bandwidth test min repeats (-b): 2
bandwidth test max repeats (-B): 3
bandwidth test mem realloc (-M): no (-m for realloc)
latency test repeats (-l): 3
latency test count (-c): 1000000
==========================================================================
== Memory bandwidth tests ==
== ==
== Note 1: 1MB = 1000000 bytes ==
== Note 2: Test result is the best of repeated runs. Number of repeats ==
== is shown in brackets ==
== Note 3: Results for 'copy' tests show how many bytes can be ==
== copied per second (adding together read and writen ==
== bytes would have provided twice higher numbers) ==
== Note 4: 2-pass copy means that we are using a small temporary buffer ==
== to first fetch data into it, and only then write it to the ==
== destination (source -> L1 cache, L1 cache -> destination) ==
== Note 5: If sample standard deviation exceeds 0.1%, it is shown in ==
== brackets ==
==========================================================================
C copy backwards : 2538.8 MB/s (3, 2.3%)
C copy backwards (32 byte blocks) : 2559.5 MB/s (3, 0.2%)
C copy backwards (64 byte blocks) : 2585.9 MB/s (2)
C copy : 5124.8 MB/s (2)
C copy prefetched (32 bytes step) : 2438.4 MB/s (3, 0.2%)
C copy prefetched (64 bytes step) : 5147.1 MB/s (2)
C 2-pass copy : 3119.7 MB/s (3, 0.3%)
C 2-pass copy prefetched (32 bytes step) : 1736.1 MB/s (2)
C 2-pass copy prefetched (64 bytes step) : 3229.5 MB/s (2)
C scan 8 : 614.8 MB/s (2)
C scan 16 : 1224.3 MB/s (2)
C scan 32 : 2370.3 MB/s (2)
C scan 64 : 4534.5 MB/s (2)
C fill : 12028.3 MB/s (2)
C fill (shuffle within 16 byte blocks) : 12035.6 MB/s (3, 0.2%)
C fill (shuffle within 32 byte blocks) : 12024.3 MB/s (3, 1.4%)
C fill (shuffle within 64 byte blocks) : 12047.4 MB/s (3, 1.6%)
---
libc memcpy copy : 5103.1 MB/s (2)
libc memchr scan : 3671.0 MB/s (3, 0.2%)
libc memset fill : 12068.3 MB/s (3, 0.1%)
---
NEON LDP/STP copy : 5111.4 MB/s (3, 0.7%)
NEON LDP/STP copy pldl2strm (32 bytes step) : 2233.0 MB/s (3, 0.2%)
NEON LDP/STP copy pldl2strm (64 bytes step) : 3973.6 MB/s (2)
NEON LDP/STP copy pldl1keep (32 bytes step) : 2846.2 MB/s (3, 0.1%)
NEON LDP/STP copy pldl1keep (64 bytes step) : 5141.4 MB/s (2)
NEON LD1/ST1 copy : 5105.1 MB/s (3, 0.7%)
NEON LDP load : 8889.5 MB/s (2)
NEON LDNP load : 9291.5 MB/s (3, 0.3%)
NEON STP fill : 12039.8 MB/s (2)
NEON STNP fill : 6525.6 MB/s (3, 0.1%)
ARM LDP/STP copy : 5101.1 MB/s (3, 0.5%)
ARM LDP load : 8884.8 MB/s (3)
ARM LDNP load : 9294.3 MB/s (3, 0.4%)
ARM STP fill : 12069.7 MB/s (3, 0.2%)
ARM STNP fill : 6497.7 MB/s (3, 1.1%)
==========================================================================
== Framebuffer read tests. ==
== ==
== Many ARM devices use a part of the system memory as the framebuffer, ==
== typically mapped as uncached but with write-combining enabled. ==
== Writes to such framebuffers are quite fast, but reads are much ==
== slower and very sensitive to the alignment and the selection of ==
== CPU instructions which are used for accessing memory. ==
== ==
== Many x86 systems allocate the framebuffer in the GPU memory, ==
== accessible for the CPU via a relatively slow PCI-E bus. Moreover, ==
== PCI-E is asymmetric and handles reads a lot worse than writes. ==
== ==
== If uncached framebuffer reads are reasonably fast (at least 100 MB/s ==
== or preferably >300 MB/s), then using the shadow framebuffer layer ==
== is not necessary in Xorg DDX drivers, resulting in a nice overall ==
== performance improvement. For example, the xf86-video-fbturbo DDX ==
== uses this trick. ==
==========================================================================
NEON LDP/STP copy (from framebuffer) : 309.8 MB/s (2)
NEON LDP/STP 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 307.4 MB/s (2)
NEON LD1/ST1 copy (from framebuffer) : 80.8 MB/s (2)
NEON LD1/ST1 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 80.3 MB/s (2)
ARM LDP/STP copy (from framebuffer) : 160.0 MB/s (2)
ARM LDP/STP 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 157.6 MB/s (2)
==========================================================================
== Memory latency test ==
== ==
== Average time is measured for random memory accesses in the buffers ==
== of different sizes. The larger is the buffer, the more significant ==
== are relative contributions of TLB, L1/L2 cache misses and SDRAM ==
== accesses. For extremely large buffer sizes we are expecting to see ==
== page table walk with several requests to SDRAM for almost every ==
== memory access (though 64MiB is not nearly large enough to experience ==
== this effect to its fullest). ==
== ==
== Note 1: All the numbers are representing extra time, which needs to ==
== be added to L1 cache latency. The cycle timings for L1 cache ==
== latency can be usually found in the processor documentation. ==
== Note 2: Dual random read means that we are simultaneously performing ==
== two independent memory accesses at a time. In the case if ==
== the memory subsystem can't handle multiple outstanding ==
== requests, dual random read has the same timings as two ==
== single reads performed one after another. ==
==========================================================================
block size : single random read / dual random read, [MADV_NOHUGEPAGE]
1024 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
2048 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
4096 : 0.1 ns / 0.0 ns
8192 : 0.1 ns / 0.0 ns
16384 : 0.0 ns / 0.1 ns
32768 : 0.5 ns / 0.5 ns
65536 : 1.1 ns / 1.7 ns
131072 : 4.6 ns / 7.0 ns
262144 : 8.2 ns / 10.6 ns
524288 : 13.3 ns / 16.3 ns
1048576 : 48.5 ns / 71.0 ns
2097152 : 71.3 ns / 93.8 ns
4194304 : 83.0 ns / 101.5 ns
8388608 : 91.7 ns / 107.7 ns
16777216 : 96.5 ns / 111.3 ns
33554432 : 101.0 ns / 117.0 ns
67108864 : 104.6 ns / 122.1 ns
block size : single random read / dual random read, [MADV_HUGEPAGE]
1024 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
2048 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
4096 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
8192 : 0.0 ns / 0.1 ns
16384 : 0.0 ns / 0.1 ns
32768 : 0.3 ns / 0.7 ns
65536 : 1.0 ns / 1.9 ns
131072 : 4.5 ns / 7.0 ns
262144 : 8.2 ns / 10.6 ns
524288 : 11.8 ns / 13.3 ns
1048576 : 48.3 ns / 71.0 ns
2097152 : 71.2 ns / 93.7 ns
4194304 : 82.5 ns / 101.3 ns
8388608 : 88.3 ns / 103.7 ns
16777216 : 91.0 ns / 104.7 ns
33554432 : 92.1 ns / 105.0 ns
67108864 : 92.6 ns / 105.2 ns
##########################################################################
Executing ramlat on cpu0 (Cortex-A55), results in ns:
size: 1x32 2x32 1x64 2x64 1xPTR 2xPTR 4xPTR 8xPTR
4k: 1.220 1.211 1.207 1.201 0.801 1.201 1.626 3.279
8k: 1.201 1.201 1.201 1.201 0.801 1.201 1.626 3.279
16k: 1.209 1.205 1.208 1.202 0.812 1.201 1.627 3.279
32k: 1.222 1.203 1.220 1.204 0.811 1.204 1.630 3.293
64k: 7.069 7.898 7.066 7.899 7.172 7.903 11.44 20.97
128k: 11.47 12.57 11.47 12.49 10.89 12.52 19.36 35.41
256k: 12.30 12.44 12.29 12.45 11.74 12.44 20.59 39.51
512k: 23.07 27.52 22.83 31.33 22.85 28.16 45.85 86.81
1024k: 76.04 79.09 69.24 78.48 68.90 79.63 118.4 225.7
2048k: 89.09 90.33 84.68 90.16 84.43 93.43 137.9 257.4
4096k: 94.00 95.69 93.83 100.6 93.50 98.07 141.5 263.5
8192k: 98.44 98.89 98.33 98.79 98.08 102.4 148.5 269.8
16384k: 99.67 100.1 99.64 100.2 99.43 103.4 146.0 277.2
32768k: 101.6 102.7 101.4 104.6 100.8 103.8 146.8 277.2
65536k: 106.1 107.2 105.9 107.2 105.3 107.6 150.8 275.3
131072k: 109.8 111.0 111.8 110.9 108.5 110.6 150.2 278.3
##########################################################################
Executing benchmark twice on cluster 0 (Cortex-A55)
OpenSSL 3.0.2, built on 15 Mar 2022 (Library: OpenSSL 3.0.2 15 Mar 2022)
type 16 bytes 64 bytes 256 bytes 1024 bytes 8192 bytes 16384 bytes
aes-128-cbc 222344.37k 658977.49k 1289577.56k 1702589.78k 1878603.09k 1891696.64k
aes-128-cbc 222677.77k 659195.63k 1287876.61k 1703552.34k 1879116.46k 1893619.03k
aes-192-cbc 212037.30k 586776.17k 1050317.40k 1312000.00k 1414261.42k 1422693.72k
aes-192-cbc 212105.95k 586791.79k 1049805.91k 1311345.32k 1414564.52k 1422966.78k
aes-256-cbc 205513.27k 539471.94k 907366.49k 1095980.37k 1167327.23k 1172832.26k
aes-256-cbc 205532.34k 537623.94k 906652.93k 1096497.83k 1167209.81k 1173007.02k
##########################################################################
Executing benchmark single-threaded on cpu0 (Cortex-A55)
7-Zip (a) [64] 16.02 : Copyright (c) 1999-2016 Igor Pavlov : 2016-05-21
p7zip Version 16.02 (locale=C,Utf16=off,HugeFiles=on,64 bits,4 CPUs LE)
LE
CPU Freq: 64000000 64000000 64000000 - - - - - -
RAM size: 3678 MB, # CPU hardware threads: 4
RAM usage: 435 MB, # Benchmark threads: 1
Compressing | Decompressing
Dict Speed Usage R/U Rating | Speed Usage R/U Rating
KiB/s % MIPS MIPS | KiB/s % MIPS MIPS
22: 1474 99 1452 1435 | 28946 99 2495 2471
23: 1378 99 1421 1404 | 28350 99 2478 2454
24: 1318 99 1434 1417 | 27717 99 2457 2433
25: 1239 99 1432 1416 | 26905 99 2419 2395
---------------------------------- | ------------------------------
Avr: 99 1435 1418 | 99 2462 2438
Tot: 99 1949 1928
##########################################################################
Executing benchmark 3 times multi-threaded on CPUs 0-3
7-Zip (a) [64] 16.02 : Copyright (c) 1999-2016 Igor Pavlov : 2016-05-21
p7zip Version 16.02 (locale=C,Utf16=off,HugeFiles=on,64 bits,4 CPUs LE)
LE
CPU Freq: - - - - - - - - -
RAM size: 3678 MB, # CPU hardware threads: 4
RAM usage: 882 MB, # Benchmark threads: 4
Compressing | Decompressing
Dict Speed Usage R/U Rating | Speed Usage R/U Rating
KiB/s % MIPS MIPS | KiB/s % MIPS MIPS
22: 4527 334 1318 4404 | 113638 395 2458 9695
23: 4549 357 1297 4636 | 111101 395 2436 9613
24: 4467 367 1308 4804 | 108266 394 2413 9504
25: 4321 376 1311 4935 | 105075 393 2378 9352
---------------------------------- | ------------------------------
Avr: 359 1308 4695 | 394 2421 9541
Tot: 376 1865 7118
7-Zip (a) [64] 16.02 : Copyright (c) 1999-2016 Igor Pavlov : 2016-05-21
p7zip Version 16.02 (locale=C,Utf16=off,HugeFiles=on,64 bits,4 CPUs LE)
LE
CPU Freq: - - - - - - - - -
RAM size: 3678 MB, # CPU hardware threads: 4
RAM usage: 882 MB, # Benchmark threads: 4
Compressing | Decompressing
Dict Speed Usage R/U Rating | Speed Usage R/U Rating
KiB/s % MIPS MIPS | KiB/s % MIPS MIPS
22: 4726 347 1324 4598 | 113366 394 2457 9672
23: 4573 358 1301 4660 | 111064 394 2437 9610
24: 4476 369 1304 4814 | 108353 394 2412 9512
25: 4265 372 1310 4870 | 105234 394 2379 9366
---------------------------------- | ------------------------------
Avr: 362 1310 4735 | 394 2421 9540
Tot: 378 1865 7138
7-Zip (a) [64] 16.02 : Copyright (c) 1999-2016 Igor Pavlov : 2016-05-21
p7zip Version 16.02 (locale=C,Utf16=off,HugeFiles=on,64 bits,4 CPUs LE)
LE
CPU Freq: - - - - - - - - -
RAM size: 3678 MB, # CPU hardware threads: 4
RAM usage: 882 MB, # Benchmark threads: 4
Compressing | Decompressing
Dict Speed Usage R/U Rating | Speed Usage R/U Rating
KiB/s % MIPS MIPS | KiB/s % MIPS MIPS
22: 4702 345 1326 4575 | 113628 394 2458 9694
23: 4545 355 1304 4631 | 110735 394 2434 9581
24: 4455 367 1306 4790 | 108131 394 2412 9492
25: 4311 375 1312 4922 | 105156 393 2379 9359
---------------------------------- | ------------------------------
Avr: 361 1312 4730 | 394 2421 9532
Tot: 377 1866 7131
Compression: 4695,4735,4730
Decompression: 9541,9540,9532
Total: 7118,7138,7131
##########################################################################
Testing maximum cpufreq again, still under full load. System health now:
Time CPU load %cpu %sys %usr %nice %io %irq Temp
15:08:58: 2508MHz 4.34 92% 2% 89% 0% 0% 0% 51.2°C
Checking cpufreq OPP (Cortex-A55):
Cpufreq OPP: 2508 Measured: 2498 (2498.170/2498.108/2498.077)
##########################################################################
Thermal source: /sys/devices/virtual/thermal/thermal_zone0/ (soc_thermal)
System health while running tinymembench:
Time CPU load %cpu %sys %usr %nice %io %irq Temp
15:00:57: 2508MHz 0.75 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 40.9°C
15:01:07: 2508MHz 0.79 25% 0% 24% 0% 0% 0% 42.4°C
15:01:17: 2508MHz 0.83 25% 0% 24% 0% 0% 0% 43.0°C
15:01:27: 2508MHz 0.85 25% 0% 24% 0% 0% 0% 47.3°C
15:01:37: 2508MHz 0.88 25% 0% 24% 0% 0% 0% 47.2°C
15:01:47: 2508MHz 0.90 25% 0% 24% 0% 0% 0% 48.5°C
15:01:57: 2508MHz 0.91 25% 0% 24% 0% 0% 0% 49.5°C
15:02:07: 2508MHz 0.93 26% 0% 24% 0% 0% 0% 49.7°C
15:02:17: 2508MHz 0.94 25% 0% 24% 0% 0% 0% 43.1°C
15:02:27: 2508MHz 0.95 25% 0% 24% 0% 0% 0% 42.7°C
System health while running ramlat:
Time CPU load %cpu %sys %usr %nice %io %irq Temp
15:02:28: 2508MHz 1.03 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 44.4°C
15:02:31: 2508MHz 1.03 25% 0% 24% 0% 0% 0% 42.4°C
15:02:34: 2508MHz 1.03 25% 0% 24% 0% 0% 0% 42.5°C
15:02:37: 2508MHz 1.03 25% 0% 24% 0% 0% 0% 42.7°C
15:02:40: 2508MHz 1.03 25% 0% 24% 0% 0% 0% 42.8°C
15:02:43: 2508MHz 1.03 25% 0% 24% 0% 0% 0% 42.5°C
15:02:46: 2508MHz 1.03 25% 0% 24% 0% 0% 0% 42.3°C
15:02:50: 2508MHz 1.02 25% 0% 24% 0% 0% 0% 42.8°C
15:02:53: 2508MHz 1.02 25% 0% 24% 0% 0% 0% 42.4°C
15:02:56: 2508MHz 1.02 25% 0% 24% 0% 0% 0% 43.0°C
System health while running OpenSSL benchmark:
Time CPU load %cpu %sys %usr %nice %io %irq Temp
15:02:59: 2508MHz 1.02 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 44.5°C
15:03:15: 2508MHz 1.01 25% 0% 25% 0% 0% 0% 42.3°C
15:03:31: 2508MHz 1.01 25% 0% 24% 0% 0% 0% 42.3°C
15:03:47: 2508MHz 1.01 25% 0% 24% 0% 0% 0% 42.2°C
15:04:03: 2508MHz 1.00 25% 0% 24% 0% 0% 0% 42.2°C
15:04:19: 2508MHz 1.00 25% 0% 24% 0% 0% 0% 41.9°C
15:04:35: 2508MHz 1.16 25% 0% 24% 0% 0% 0% 41.9°C
System health while running 7-zip single core benchmark:
Time CPU load %cpu %sys %usr %nice %io %irq Temp
15:04:47: 2508MHz 1.14 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 43.4°C
15:04:53: 2508MHz 1.12 25% 0% 24% 0% 0% 0% 41.5°C
15:04:59: 2508MHz 1.11 25% 0% 24% 0% 0% 0% 41.7°C
15:05:05: 2508MHz 1.10 25% 0% 24% 0% 0% 0% 41.4°C
15:05:11: 2508MHz 1.09 25% 0% 24% 0% 0% 0% 41.7°C
15:05:17: 2508MHz 1.08 25% 0% 24% 0% 0% 0% 41.5°C
15:05:23: 2508MHz 1.07 25% 0% 24% 0% 0% 0% 41.3°C
15:05:29: 2508MHz 1.06 25% 0% 24% 0% 0% 0% 41.6°C
15:05:35: 2508MHz 1.06 25% 0% 24% 0% 0% 0% 41.5°C
15:05:41: 2508MHz 1.05 25% 0% 24% 0% 0% 0% 41.3°C
15:05:47: 2508MHz 1.05 25% 0% 24% 0% 0% 0% 41.2°C
15:05:53: 2508MHz 1.04 25% 0% 24% 0% 0% 0% 41.3°C
15:06:00: 2508MHz 1.04 25% 0% 24% 0% 0% 0% 41.2°C
15:06:06: 2508MHz 1.03 25% 0% 24% 0% 0% 0% 41.6°C
System health while running 7-zip multi core benchmark:
Time CPU load %cpu %sys %usr %nice %io %irq Temp
15:06:08: 2508MHz 1.43 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 44.9°C
15:06:21: 2508MHz 1.75 92% 0% 91% 0% 0% 0% 48.0°C
15:06:35: 2508MHz 2.34 93% 1% 91% 0% 0% 0% 48.6°C
15:06:48: 2508MHz 2.70 93% 1% 90% 0% 0% 0% 48.9°C
15:07:01: 2508MHz 2.97 97% 2% 93% 0% 0% 0% 49.0°C
15:07:17: 2508MHz 3.20 93% 1% 91% 0% 0% 0% 51.4°C
15:07:31: 2508MHz 3.52 96% 0% 95% 0% 0% 0% 52.6°C
15:07:45: 2508MHz 3.63 94% 1% 92% 0% 0% 0% 52.6°C
15:07:58: 2508MHz 3.94 91% 2% 87% 0% 0% 0% 50.3°C
15:08:12: 2508MHz 3.71 93% 1% 91% 0% 0% 0% 50.4°C
15:08:28: 2508MHz 3.84 94% 1% 93% 0% 0% 0% 52.8°C
15:08:44: 2508MHz 4.25 95% 1% 92% 0% 0% 0% 53.0°C
15:08:58: 2508MHz 4.34 92% 2% 89% 0% 0% 0% 51.2°C
##########################################################################
Linux 5.15.153-odroid-arm64 (server) 05/27/25 _aarch64_ (4 CPU)
avg-cpu: %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle
0.59 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.00 99.19
Device tps kB_read/s kB_wrtn/s kB_dscd/s kB_read kB_wrtn kB_dscd
mmcblk0 0.35 5.12 4.80 0.00 459794 431160 0
total used free shared buff/cache available
Mem: 3.6Gi 265Mi 3.2Gi 1.0Mi 94Mi 3.2Gi
Swap: 0B 0B 0B
CPU sysfs topology (clusters, cpufreq members, clockspeeds)
cpufreq min max
CPU cluster policy speed speed core type
0 0 0 100 2508 Cortex-A55 / r2p0
1 0 0 100 2508 Cortex-A55 / r2p0
2 0 0 100 2508 Cortex-A55 / r2p0
3 0 0 100 2508 Cortex-A55 / r2p0
Architecture: aarch64
CPU op-mode(s): 32-bit, 64-bit
Byte Order: Little Endian
CPU(s): 4
On-line CPU(s) list: 0-3
Vendor ID: ARM
Model name: Cortex-A55
Model: 0
Thread(s) per core: 1
Core(s) per cluster: 4
Socket(s): -
Cluster(s): 1
Stepping: r2p0
CPU max MHz: 2508.0000
CPU min MHz: 100.0000
BogoMIPS: 48.00
Flags: fp asimd evtstrm aes pmull sha1 sha2 crc32 atomics fphp asimdhp cpuid asimdrdm lrcpc dcpop asimddp
Vulnerability Gather data sampling: Not affected
Vulnerability Itlb multihit: Not affected
Vulnerability L1tf: Not affected
Vulnerability Mds: Not affected
Vulnerability Meltdown: Not affected
Vulnerability Mmio stale data: Not affected
Vulnerability Retbleed: Not affected
Vulnerability Spec rstack overflow: Not affected
Vulnerability Spec store bypass: Not affected
Vulnerability Spectre v1: Mitigation; __user pointer sanitization
Vulnerability Spectre v2: Not affected
Vulnerability Srbds: Not affected
Vulnerability Tsx async abort: Not affected
cpuinfo: http://0x0.st/8x6m.txt
Signature: 00A55r2p000A55r2p000A55r2p000A55r2p0
DT compat: s7d_s905x5m_bm201
Compiler: /usr/bin/gcc (Ubuntu 11.4.0-1ubuntu1~22.04) 11.4.0 / aarch64-linux-gnu
Userland: arm64
Kernel: 5.15.153-odroid-arm64/aarch64
CONFIG_HZ=250
CONFIG_HZ_250=y
CONFIG_PREEMPTION=y
CONFIG_PREEMPT=y
CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT=y
CONFIG_PREEMPT_NOTIFIERS=y
CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU=y
##########################################################################
cpu_opp_table0:
100 MHz 729.0 mV
250 MHz 729.0 mV
500 MHz 729.0 mV
667 MHz 729.0 mV
1000 MHz 729.0 mV
1200 MHz 739.0 mV
1404 MHz 769.0 mV
1608 MHz 799.0 mV
1800 MHz 829.0 mV
2004 MHz 919.0 mV
2208 MHz 919.0 mV
2304 MHz 919.0 mV
2400 MHz 949.0 mV
2508 MHz 959.0 mV
cpu_opp_table1:
100 MHz 729.0 mV
250 MHz 729.0 mV
500 MHz 729.0 mV
667 MHz 729.0 mV
1000 MHz 729.0 mV
1200 MHz 739.0 mV
1404 MHz 769.0 mV
1608 MHz 799.0 mV
1800 MHz 829.0 mV
2004 MHz 919.0 mV
2208 MHz 919.0 mV
2304 MHz 919.0 mV
2400 MHz 949.0 mV
2508 MHz 959.0 mV
cpu_opp_table2:
100 MHz 729.0 mV
250 MHz 729.0 mV
500 MHz 729.0 mV
667 MHz 729.0 mV
1000 MHz 729.0 mV
1200 MHz 729.0 mV
1404 MHz 729.0 mV
1608 MHz 759.0 mV
1800 MHz 789.0 mV
2004 MHz 879.0 mV
2208 MHz 879.0 mV
2304 MHz 879.0 mV
2400 MHz 909.0 mV
2508 MHz 919.0 mV
cpu_opp_table3:
100 MHz 709.0 mV
250 MHz 709.0 mV
500 MHz 709.0 mV
667 MHz 709.0 mV
1000 MHz 709.0 mV
1200 MHz 709.0 mV
1404 MHz 709.0 mV
1608 MHz 719.0 mV
1800 MHz 749.0 mV
2004 MHz 829.0 mV
2208 MHz 829.0 mV
2304 MHz 829.0 mV
2400 MHz 859.0 mV
2508 MHz 869.0 mV
gpu_opp_table:
286 MHz 1.1 mV
400 MHz 1.1 mV
500 MHz 1.1 mV
667 MHz 1.1 mV
852 MHz 1.1 mV
##########################################################################
Results validation:
* Measured clockspeed not lower than advertised max CPU clockspeed
* Background activity (%system) OK
* No throttling
Status of performance related governors found below /sys (w/o cpufreq):
* fd000000.valhall: performance / 852 MHz (userspace powersave performance simple_ondemand / 286 400 500 667 852)
* p_tsensor@fe020000: power_allocator
Status of performance related policies found below /sys:
* /sys/class/video/aipq_set_policy: aipq_set_policy: 0
* /sys/devices/platform/fd000000.valhall/power_policy: coarse_demand [always_on]
| Hardkernel ODROID-C5 | 2508 MHz | 5.15 | Ubuntu 22.04.5 LTS (jammy) arm64 | 7130 | 1928 | 1172920 | 5100 | 12070 | - |