You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the released Hy-Embodied-0.5-VLA-Data dataset, task_index=992 maps to "__UNKNOWN__" in meta/tasks.parquet. This bucket contains a remarkably stable ~25% of episodes across all 22 tables (see stats below). I've inspected several such episodes and they contain complete, well-formed operator demonstrations — the language label seems intentionally set to "__UNKNOWN__", not missing due to error.
We couldn't find any explanation in:
The paper (arXiv 2606.14409v2) — no mention of __UNKNOWN__ / unlabeled / self-supervised / 25% split.
The official hy_vla/data/umi_dataset.py — _resolve_instruction() returns the raw string as-is (no special handling of __UNKNOWN__).
The HuggingFace dataset card and README — no note.
We verified: the HF and ModelScope copies of meta/tasks.parquet are byte-identical, so this is not a mirror-specific artifact.
Could you clarify what __UNKNOWN__ means and how you intend it to be used during training?
Empirical stats (all 22 tables)
table
total eps
unknown eps
ratio
table_000
11604
2897
24.97%
table_001
11594
3006
25.93%
table_002
11484
2891
25.17%
...
...
...
...
table_021
7587
1916
25.25%
TOTAL
250135
63046
25.20%
Across 22 tables: mean 25.21%, std 0.41%, min 24.58%, max 26.11%. The tight variance strongly suggests this is a deliberate design choice, not classification noise or a labeling failure.
Additional data points:
tasks.parquet defines 993 tasks total, but only 651 unique task_index values appear across all 22 tables (~34% defined but never used).
One __UNKNOWN__ episode I inspected (table_000, ep 0, 1566 frames / 52s): the cam_high video clearly shows the operator manipulating a silver ring on a tabletop — a complete pick-and-place-style demonstration. The state, quaternions, and gripper signal are all valid; only the language label is "__UNKNOWN__".
Specific questions
Is __UNKNOWN__ intentional? Is this a bucket for episodes deliberately released without task labels (e.g. as unsupervised visual pretraining data), or is it a placeholder for episodes whose labels didn't pass some quality/filtering criterion?
How does HyVLA-0.5 training handle these episodes? From umi_dataset.py, it looks like the raw "__UNKNOWN__" string would be tokenized as-is and fed into the VLM as the language instruction. Is this correct, or does the training pipeline filter/replace them at the collate/loader level?
Is there a relationship to the IK feasibility filtering mentioned in the paper's data preprocessing? (See also related issue How to check "single-pass IK feasibility"? #10.) i.e. did episodes that failed the single-pass IK feasibility check get bucketed into task_index=992?
Would you recommend a specific treatment for downstream users:
(a) Include these episodes with "__UNKNOWN__" as the language input as-is;
(b) Filter them out;
(c) Replace the label with a generic prompt (e.g. "perform a bimanual manipulation task");
(d) Use them for language-free vision+action pretraining only?
Any clarification would be very helpful for correctly using the dataset in downstream training.
Summary
In the released
Hy-Embodied-0.5-VLA-Datadataset,task_index=992maps to"__UNKNOWN__"inmeta/tasks.parquet. This bucket contains a remarkably stable ~25% of episodes across all 22 tables (see stats below). I've inspected several such episodes and they contain complete, well-formed operator demonstrations — the language label seems intentionally set to"__UNKNOWN__", not missing due to error.We couldn't find any explanation in:
__UNKNOWN__/ unlabeled / self-supervised / 25% split.hy_vla/data/umi_dataset.py—_resolve_instruction()returns the raw string as-is (no special handling of__UNKNOWN__).meta/tasks.parquetare byte-identical, so this is not a mirror-specific artifact.Could you clarify what
__UNKNOWN__means and how you intend it to be used during training?Empirical stats (all 22 tables)
Across 22 tables: mean 25.21%, std 0.41%, min 24.58%, max 26.11%. The tight variance strongly suggests this is a deliberate design choice, not classification noise or a labeling failure.
Additional data points:
tasks.parquetdefines 993 tasks total, but only 651 unique task_index values appear across all 22 tables (~34% defined but never used).__UNKNOWN__episode I inspected (table_000, ep 0, 1566 frames / 52s): the cam_high video clearly shows the operator manipulating a silver ring on a tabletop — a complete pick-and-place-style demonstration. The state, quaternions, and gripper signal are all valid; only the language label is"__UNKNOWN__".Specific questions
Is
__UNKNOWN__intentional? Is this a bucket for episodes deliberately released without task labels (e.g. as unsupervised visual pretraining data), or is it a placeholder for episodes whose labels didn't pass some quality/filtering criterion?How does HyVLA-0.5 training handle these episodes? From
umi_dataset.py, it looks like the raw"__UNKNOWN__"string would be tokenized as-is and fed into the VLM as the language instruction. Is this correct, or does the training pipeline filter/replace them at the collate/loader level?Is there a relationship to the IK feasibility filtering mentioned in the paper's data preprocessing? (See also related issue How to check "single-pass IK feasibility"? #10.) i.e. did episodes that failed the single-pass IK feasibility check get bucketed into
task_index=992?Would you recommend a specific treatment for downstream users:
"__UNKNOWN__"as the language input as-is;"perform a bimanual manipulation task");Any clarification would be very helpful for correctly using the dataset in downstream training.
Thanks for the great open release!