Update paper.tex

Co-authored-by: Magnus Hagdorn <magnus.hagdorn@charite.de>

Author: dokempf

paper.tex

@@ -629,7 +629,7 @@ \subsubsection{Risk Assessment and Mitigation}
 Naturally, establishing a “new” department like an RSE department at an academic institution will lead to a realignment of responsibilities of existing departments.
 Units that might be affected include not only traditional IT centres, libraries, but also RDM units and legal offices.
 We argue, that an RSE unit does not aim to replace them, but offers new possibilities to connect these existing departments and thereby enables an academic insititution to offer a stronger service portfolio to its researchers.
-Giving the new RSE department a clear mandate and mission statements delineating it from other departments further mitigates this.
+Giving the new RSE department a clear mandate and mission statements ensures further delineation from other departments and helps to avoid overlapping responsibilities.```
 The governance of an RSE unit and its location within the organisational chart depend on the specifics of each institution.
 In order to avoid risks from unclear governance, however, leadership and responsibilities should be clearly set out at the inception of the unit.
 Finding qualified staff for an RSE unit is a challenging task, so there is a risk of it failing due to not being able to recruit the required staff.